Message-ID: <4E456E23.9090504@freenet.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:17:07 +0200
From: wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4E4527EF.2000304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E455D91.6030907@freenet.de> <4E4562C9.2050804@freenet.de> <85D78B6541034C9A9498E9191F694BD4@PcMinto>
In-Reply-To: <85D78B6541034C9A9498E9191F694BD4@PcMinto>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: PA3BCA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40854e456e606f60
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Hi Minto,

hope you received the mail to your personal mail address.
Yes, looks much better now. Your QTH seems to be plagued by similar QRM 
as mine.
Speaking about flourescent lamps: I just bought an electronic ballast 
for a 36 Watt "PL-L" tube by Philips ("HF-P 136") which runs on 45 kHz, 
as replace for an inefficient inductor balast. No QRM from that device 
on any band checked so far ! And the input power consumed from lamp plus 
ballast drop from 44 Watt (with inductor ballast) to only 37 Watt (with 
electronic ballast). Not bad, since this lamp runs 12 hours a day. So 
not all of these new lamps deserve a bad reputation ;)

73,
   Wolf .