Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2DNB8Uo031608 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:11:09 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1evsza-0002IC-5v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:06:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1evszX-0002I3-B2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:05:59 +0000 Received: from rgout0501.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.222] helo=rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1evszU-0000uy-D4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:05:57 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 109.152.80.233 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=12/50,refid=2.7.2:2018.3.13.225716:17:12.455,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, __MIME_TEXT_P, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtgedrtddugddtiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkhffvfhfuffggtgfgrfgioffqsehtjeejtddutddunecuhfhrohhmpedftehlrghnucfovghlihgrfdcuoegrlhgrnhdrmhgvlhhirgessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepuddtledrudehvddrkedtrddvfeefnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopehgnhgrthdpihhnvghtpedutdelrdduhedvrdektddrvdeffedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeorghlrghnrdhmvghlihgrsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheqnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd Received: from gnat (109.152.80.233) by rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.24-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5A9D3FC300CA3196 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:05:54 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1520982356; bh=oWh4dpHXpve6D254AOFzjYtVSAzOl3COeqkb7pkY80s=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=rhL6I7VniT9xQnuvQjdacZSPigfAmzHGiCNFKVbTK6JMwG1HL3wrzccJFrkuVEe7xMZfJV5bkTJhX7k5hSm6yfDwrTxn7grJu6MhHbLegu6cPekdyc3usXfpJa7TTb5MdQIhisSIXmqktz5hdLzWFKnz0qB2gDYx+BQTGTjt9hc= Message-ID: <4E0E7F92677E49A49567215BBA4C55B2@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <1115959624.20180313222044@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:40:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Chris if you are not listening to the same frequency on both you dont want a splitter you need a diplexer. This is effectively two filter with a common input, one is lowpass for LF one is HP for MF (though you may also need a LP in this side to reject BC TXs. I think there is design gen in Wes Hayward's Intro to RF Design [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: LF: Re: Antenna splitter question Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Chris if you are not listening to the same frequency on both you dont want a splitter you need a diplexer. This is effectively two filter with a common input, one is lowpass for LF one is HP for MF (though you may also need a LP in this side to reject BC TXs. I think there is design gen in Wes Hayward's Intro to RF Design You can make a minimum loss splitter .....I have used one on 136 for two receivers but you lose about 4.5dB I think. Mine was 1.4 : 1+1 where ''1'' is a winding on a toroid with a reactance of about 250ohms. Its based on a Racal design (Brian CT1DRP used to work for them) the 1+1 can be centre tapped to ground. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Wilson" To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 10:20 PM Subject: LF: Antenna splitter question > > > Hello LF 'ers, > > I am trying out a Red Pitaya on LF RX. It's running the open source > HPSDR software which I have never really liked or got to grips with. > With huge respect to the writers it always seems like it now needs a > ground up re write as it has grown beyond its user interface IMHO, and > is far from intuitive to use. However, I may be stuck with it as the > firmware for running HDSDR which I am fully comfortable with and which > has been my go to software for SDR for many years, has not worked for > me with the Red Pitaya, although I haven't quite given up yet. > > HPSDR allows 2 receivers in effect, but having the one aerial means I > will probably have to use a splitter. I would like to RX on LF and MF > at the same time. I haven't seen a commercially made one that goes low > enough, has anyone got a link to a DIY one please? Thanks. > > I am running the Red Pitaya for the first tie tonight, I had to add a > pre amp in front of it as it seemed a bit deaf on LF, I will be very > curious to see how it works. Listening for WSPR2 and WSPR15. > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > >