Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.21]) by air-de07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE071-5eba4d8979c811e; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:40:40 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 38D783800009D; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:40:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2Fqk-0004Ag-Lo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:39:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2Fqg-0004AX-JV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:39:10 +0000 Received: from outbound04.telus.net ([199.185.220.223] helo=defout.telus.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Fqd-0000H6-MI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:39:10 +0000 Received: from edtncm03 ([199.185.220.221]) by priv-edtnes23.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20110323043904.RFYK22376.priv-edtnes23.telusplanet.net@edtncm03> for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:39:04 -0600 Received: from [192.168.1.74] ([75.157.141.251]) by edtncm03 with bizsmtp id NUf31g00J5Reinf01Uf3My; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:39:04 -0600 X-Telus-Outbound-IP: 75.157.141.251 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=qJkQFdQ48ZbK16dQTlA9duG84kZgQD4m081ovRDdU+I= c=1 sm=2 a=jVez_htjv6wA:10 a=ahq2uCsmvPoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=nsZdES5nqPZy919RMUUA:9 a=OwJsgT0e6gnwXjtJjmkGhrY5cmwA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Message-ID: <4D897966.7040709@telus.net> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:39:02 -0700 From: Scott Tilley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4D83D475.9090609@telus.net> <000b01cbe622$6a23f8d0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL>, ,<4D86BD6F.8020006@telus.net> <4D8736CB.8040509@telus.net> <4D87E247.5020100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4D87E247.5020100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60154d8979c62cf2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) > But, unfortunately, i think there is another problem: If you try that > with your loop, who will be the next receiving station? What distance? > Even if you run 100A rms into that loop (BTW, what is the area?) you > will radiate probably below 1 mW ERP... > Hi Stephan Look up, way up in AK! Laurence is hanging around with his RX system at a mere 2000km over water. A stones through from here :-) 73 Scott