Message-ID: <4D7A96BF.5050703@talktalk.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:40:15 +0000
From: "qrss@talktalk.net" <qrss@talktalk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <8CDAC566BD54D9E-C98-93FD@Webmail-m125.sysops.aol.com>,<4D77B7AF.3040104@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <BAY154-w35FCE8E1BB87814F293A48D3C80@phx.gbl>,<4D79C6A3.3070900@talktalk.net> <BAY154-w5735FD644779B226D77DC7D3CB0@phx.gbl> <4D7A6700.50104@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4D7A6BD4.6010901@freenet.de> <4D7A70AB.4010105@talktalk.net> <C52E27A426984E448016511DB9E22615@White>
In-Reply-To: <C52E27A426984E448016511DB9E22615@White>
Subject: Re: LF: OK2BVG_TX_8970
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------000807070302010005050504"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--------------000807070302010005050504
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Marcus

Spoil the fun, no way, thank you for your observation, I read Paul's 
early query about 2 carriers and took the 80uHz as Lubos' signal, my 
line is in that region. At least you could see my line :-) we must 
suspect that there was a couple of stable carriers within the time frame 
of OK2BVG, maybe not that stable hence the fuzz.
Well I wasn't convinced. We are learning all this 8.9k at this end, feel 
free to spot the deliberate misconceptions:O:-)

73 Eddie

On 11/03/2011 21:13, Markus Vester wrote:
> Dear Lubos, Eddie,
> congratulations on the second reception by Paul Nicholson. Together 
> with OE3GHB, this must be the record detection distance from a 
> non-airborne home antenna.
> Eddie, I don't want to be the one who spoils the fun, but I'm quite 
> sure that the weak trace in your capture is too close to 8970 
> to possibly match up with Lubos. Uwe's clear trace on your other 
> screenshot verifies that your calibration is perfect. On the other 
> hand, the trace on Gerhard's calibrated grabber shows that Lubos 
> actually transmitted just below - 5 mHz, matching up with Paul.
> Best 73,
> Markus (DF6NM)
> **
> *From:* qrss@talktalk.net <mailto:qrss@talktalk.net>
> *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 7:57 PM
> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> *Subject:* Re: LF: OK2BVG_TX_8970
>
> Hello Wolf
> Yes Paul made Lubos' frequency a little lower than 8.970kHz, I 
> measured my noisy line merely with the cross hairs at 8.96999863kHz. I 
> am still not convinced.
>
> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>
> On 11/03/2011 18:37, wolf_dl4yhf wrote:
> Hello Stefan, Lubos, and the group,
>
> For those who haven't seen this in the Yahoo VLF group yet:
>
> Lubos' signal has been identified by Paul in Todmorden, range is 1423km
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/message/17540
>
> Congrats to all involved !
>  73,  Wolf .
>


--------------000807070302010005050504
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3DISO-8859-2"        http-equiv=3D=
"Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#000000">
    Hi Marcus<br>
    <br>
    Spoil the fun, no way, thank you for your observation, I read Paul's
    early query about 2 carriers and took the 80uHz as Lubos' signal, my
    line is in that region. At least you could see my line=A0<span      =
  class=3D"moz-smiley-s1"><span> :-) </span></span> we must suspect
    that there was a couple of stable carriers within the time frame of
    OK2BVG, maybe not that stable hence the fuzz.<br>
    Well I wasn't convinced. We are learning all this 8.9k at this end,
    feel free to spot the deliberate misconceptions:<span        class=3D"=
moz-smiley-s14"><span> O:-) </span></span><br>
    <br>
    73 Eddie<br>
    <br>
    On 11/03/2011 21:13, Markus Vester wrote:
    <blockquote cite=3D"mid:C52E27A426984E448016511DB9E22615@White"     =
   type=3D"cite">
      <title></title>
      <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html;          cha=
rset=3DISO-8859-2">
      <meta content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.17095" name=3D"GENERATOR">
      <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Dear Lubos, Eddie,</font></div>
      <div>=A0</div>
      <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">congratulations on the second
          reception by Paul Nicholson. Together with=A0OE3GHB, this must
          be the record detection distance=A0from a non-airborne
          home=A0antenna.</font></div>
      <div>=A0</div>
      <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Eddie, I don't want to be the=
 one
          who spoils the fun, but I'm quite sure that the weak trace in
          your capture is too close to 8970 to=A0possibly match up with
          Lubos. </font><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Uwe's=A0clear trac=
e
          on your other screenshot verifies that your calibration is
          perfect. On the other hand, the trace on=A0Gerhard's calibrated
          grabber shows=A0that Lubos actually transmitted just below - 5
          mHz, matching up with Paul.</font></div>
      <div>=A0</div>
      <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Best 73,</font></div>
      <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Markus (DF6NM)</font></div>
      <div><strong></strong>=A0</div>
      <div><b>From:</b> <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true"            title=3D"ma=
ilto:qrss@talktalk.net            STRG + Klicken, um Verkn=FCpfung zu folg=
en"            href=3D"mailto:qrss@talktalk.net">qrss@talktalk.net</a> </d=
iv>
      <div style=3D"font: 10pt Tahoma;">
        <div style=3D"background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% rgb(245, 245,=
            245);">
          <div><b>Sent:</b> Friday, March 11, 2011 7:57 PM</div>
          <div><b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true"                title=
=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org                STRG + Klicken, um=
 Verkn=FCpfung zu folgen"                href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blac=
ksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org</a>
          </div>
          <div><b>Subject:</b> Re: LF: OK2BVG_TX_8970</div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Hello Wolf<br>
        Yes Paul made Lubos' frequency a little lower than 8.970kHz, I
        measured my noisy line merely with the cross hairs at
        8.96999863kHz. I am still not convinced.<br>
        <br>
        73 Eddie G3ZJO <br>
        =A0<br>
        On 11/03/2011 18:37, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: </div>
      <div>=A0</div>
      <div type=3D"cite">Hello Stefan, Lubos, and the group,<br>
        <br>
        For those who haven't seen this in the Yahoo VLF group yet:<br>
        <br>
        Lubos' signal has been identified by Paul in Todmorden, range is
        1423km<br>
        <br>
        <a class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetext"            href=3D"http://tech.=
groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/message/17540"            moz-do-not-send=
=3D"true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/message/17540</a><b=
r>
        <br>
        Congrats to all involved !<br>
        =A073,=A0 Wolf .<br>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------000807070302010005050504--