Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.9]) by air-md01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD012-8b754d656624357; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:55:16 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F1D43380002C3; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PsKmi-0006Ts-Oe for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:54:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PsKmi-0006Tj-1N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:54:04 +0000 Received: from defout.telus.net ([204.209.205.55]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PsKme-00054m-7F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:54:04 +0000 Received: from edmwcm04 ([204.209.205.55]) by priv-edmwes23.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20110223195356.VOWR3291.priv-edmwes23.telusplanet.net@edmwcm04> for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:53:56 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.74] ([75.157.148.65]) by edmwcm04 with bizsmtp id BXtw1g00H1QtnPv01XtwoU; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:53:56 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=M2ptBhuebbP5owLMGT++AagRSgqqsgwZsGbDeFa+Lfs= c=1 sm=2 a=jDLH06HsDhoA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=fkFGc9o9auMgFE6dFCcA:9 a=DpIKd27YE2Gr3ZQoQhgA:7 a=fqFB3RHHxM79TsmjH0k9XHjdcs0A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=_RhRFcbxBZMA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=muIvw5a9-cgA:10 Message-ID: <4D6565D3.2030800@telus.net> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:53:55 -0800 From: Scott Tilley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01cbd350$da52b950$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9D12856ED1E349629330C4C88C74866B@Uwe> <002f01cbd383$7eccab30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <002f01cbd383$7eccab30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Soldering enamelled copper wire Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60094d6566216ab5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Mal - Your solderingskills are as dated as your operating skills. I believe John was asking for advice on how to do this using MODERN techniques to ensure his safety and that of his home. The proper way to solder anything is with proper ventilation thus the person working on the project is not subjected to the fumes of any kind in the work area. John - This may sound expensive and complex but can be accomplished with a run of flexible metal dryer duct with an inline duct boaster fan. Vent through a nearby window. Visit your local building supply store as all parts are off the shelf types... The system is portable, flexible and cheap. Set the fan up to suck the air out the window via the ducting. Ensure you provide some kind of seal around the open window so the fumes don't have an easy way to reenter the room. I use an old blanket to wrap the duct... I'll leave the final arrangement to your imagination :-) 73 Scott VE7TIL On 2/23/2011 10:00 AM, mal hamilton wrote: > That is not the correct procedure. To avoid toxic fumes you scrape the > enamel off the wire then tin and solder. > Radio Amateurs know what to do but Appliance Operators will eventually > poison themselves. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Uwe Wensauer" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:16 PM > Subject: LF: Re: Re: Soldering enamelled copper wire > > >> Enamel removing ist much easier done: >> Built a solder bubble with the irion and pierce through slowly the bubble >> with the wire. The hot solder will melt the enamel >> >> The fume generated is toxic ! >> >> Same procedure also valuable for stranded wire (Litze). >> >> 73 >> Uwe >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "mal hamilton" >> To: >> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:57 PM >> Subject: LF: Re: Soldering enamelled copper wire >> >> >>> Yes >>> You scrape the enamel from the area to be soldered to reveal the bare >>> copper >>> wire then solder in the normal way. >>> G3KEV >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "John Rabson" >>> To: >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:23 AM >>> Subject: LF: Soldering enamelled copper wire >>> >>> >>> LF, >>> >>> I have a reel of such wire labelled as follows: >>> >>> "Wire copper enamelled >>> Part 1230983 0.71 mm 1/2 kg >>> Solder only in well ventilated area. Fumes are toxic" >>> >>> The manufacturer is stated to be Rowan Cable Products Ltd. I found > their >>> website but don't seem able to get into it to find out whether the >>> covering >>> of the wire is solderable and (if so) whether any special techniques > are >>> required. >>> >>> Can anyone advise, please? >>> >>> 73 >>> John F5VLF >>> >>> >> > >