Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.201]) by air-di07.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI071-eace4ccb1841d1; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:53:53 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D61BF38000140; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:53:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PBu45-0007DU-VO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:52:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PBu45-0007DL-Hu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:52:37 +0100 Received: from relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net ([217.69.40.75] helo=relay03.mail.uk1.eechost.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBu42-0005KL-U6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:52:37 +0100 Received: from [88.151.27.235] (helo=[192.168.1.107]) by relay03.mail.uk1.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1PBu3u-0004TQ-Q0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:52:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4CCB17E7.7060804@o2.ie> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:52:23 +0100 From: Tony User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4CCAED49.6030007@o2.ie> In-Reply-To: X-Auth-Info: 3810@permanet.ie (plain) X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: RFspace SDR-IQ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070406020502070404020100" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c94ccb183e6707 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------070406020502070404020100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Lubos I have been thinking about getting an SDR for a while now and this one=20 seems to be just right for all the things I want to do ... from LF RX to= =20 radio astronomy. I just wondered if it was too good to be true. 73, Tony, EI8JK. On 29/10/2010 19:05, Lubos OK2BVG wrote: > Hello Tony! > I am using SDR-IQ (RF Space company) for receiving on freq 5-30kHz and= =20 > I can say, it works very well. I have never tried it on 500Hz, so I=20 > can=B4t answer your question. But I like this receiver, becouse it is= =20 > fine on LF and MW. I never use it without selective preamplifier on=20 > these bands! > > 73! > > Lubos, OK2BVG > > > > Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:50:33 +0100 > > From: ei8jk@o2.ie > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Subject: LF: RFspace SDR-IQ > > > > Hello group. > > > > Has anyone any experience with this SDR ? > > It looks interesting and I'm a bit tempted, especially as it works ful= l > > spec down to 500 Hz and "usable" to 100 Hz. > > But as I have never used an SDR, I haven't got a clue if it's any good > > or not. > > --------------070406020502070404020100 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Lubos
I=A0 have been thinking about getting an SDR for a while now and this one seems to be just right for all the things I want to do ... from LF RX to radio astronomy.
I just wondered if it was too good to be true.

73, Tony, EI8JK.

On 29/10/2010 19:05, Lubos OK2BVG wrote:

Hello Tony!
I am using SDR-IQ (RF Space company) for receiving on freq 5-30kHz and I can say, it works very well. I have never tried it on 500Hz, so I can=B4t =A0answer your question. But I like this receiver, becouse it is fine on LF and MW. I never use it without selective preamplifier on these bands!

73!

Lubos, OK2BVG=A0

> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:50:33 +0100
> From: ei8jk@o2.ie
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: RFspace SDR-IQ
>
> Hello group.
>
> Has anyone any experience with this SDR ?
> It looks interesting and I'm a bit tempted, especially as it works full
> spec down to 500 Hz and "usable" to 100 Hz.
> But as I have never used an SDR, I haven't got a clue if it's any good
> or not.
>

--------------070406020502070404020100--