Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi02.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.155]) by air-me09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME091-8bc04c8ab8de348; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:01:50 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6470A3800008F; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:01:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OuAfr-00063G-Tj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:58:19 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OuAfh-000637-IR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:58:09 +0100 Received: from defout.telus.net ([204.209.205.55]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuAff-00075D-CS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:58:10 +0100 Received: from edmwaa03.telusplanet.net ([75.157.170.89]) by priv-edmwes48.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20100910205759.QIWY11163.priv-edmwes48.telusplanet.net@edmwaa03.telusplanet.net> for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:57:59 -0600 Received: from [192.168.1.67] (d75-157-170-89.bchsia.telus.net [75.157.170.89]) by edmwaa03.telusplanet.net (BorderWare Security Platform) with ESMTP id 26CF0377ABD171A7 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:57:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4C8A9BD6.7090903@telus.net> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:57:58 +0000 From: Scott Tilley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000a01cb50bc$73df5140$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <4C8A4F1C.5000302@telus.net> <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <002101cb5100$d7676b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=OLenbRwo57T6Sn1+VhldvRIs5GzSCS4oRO9p7f0eBGE= c=1 sm=0 a=VlsvQeCHHzZYdozF1C9JGw==:17 a=aatUQebYAAAA:8 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=sjlaCJEMCQdYUs0vH4wA:9 a=76Syn0HT18vzjiabr4ae06tMNKwA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=rBKJJ2Jc0C4A:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=cQwGRLhIjZfkYtN8arYA:9 a=74-T-vlyBjOpN4OwqvgA:7 a=BBxWQM5a0OWoE-Sx6eWvc6ULj5UA:4 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: QRS600 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010704010503040607050006" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400cdeca4c8ab8dd33b8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------010704010503040607050006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit She only dances at the 137KHz party. On 9/10/2010 3:57 PM, mal hamilton wrote: > Thats a mighty big TX but will the atu/caps and antenna wire stand it > especially on 9 K/cs > g3kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Scott Tilley > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Friday, September 10, 2010 4:30 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: QRS600 > > My QRO unit can pump out 2KW all night long if needed key down. > This isn't really a problem with good thermal engineering. > > Scott > VE7TIL > > On 9/10/2010 7:47 AM, mal hamilton wrote: >> How many transmitters could stand this duty cycle, especially the >> QRO versions. The time needed to send a full callsign for ID >> could well burn the TX out. >> Those using QRS 120 in the past for prolonged periods reported >> problems. >> g3kev > --------------010704010503040607050006 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
She only dances at the 137KHz party.



On 9/10/2010 3:57 PM, mal hamilton wrote:
Thats a mighty big TX but will the atu/caps and antenna wire stand it especially on 9 K/cs
 
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: LF: QRS600

My QRO unit can pump out 2KW all night long if needed key down. This isn't really a problem with good thermal engineering.

 Scott
VE7TIL

On 9/10/2010 7:47 AM, mal hamilton wrote:
How many transmitters could stand this duty cycle, especially the QRO versions. The time needed to send a full callsign for ID could well burn the TX out.
Those using QRS 120 in the past for prolonged periods reported problems.
g3kev
 
--------------010704010503040607050006--