Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.142]) by air-mf01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF013-8bcb4c89561317b; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:48:03 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (unknown [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 89EDB380000E3; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:48:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OtmCe-0001Ir-Pz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:50:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OtmCU-0001Ii-Cm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:50:22 +0100 Received: from relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net ([217.69.40.75] helo=relay03.mail.uk1.eechost.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OtmCS-0001c1-5V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:50:22 +0100 Received: from [88.151.27.235] (helo=[192.168.1.107]) by relay03.mail.uk1.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1OtmCJ-00053t-8N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:50:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4C892C46.4080807@o2.ie> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:49:42 +0100 From: Tony User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <009001cb504d$39b9e8a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <009001cb504d$39b9e8a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Auth-Info: 3810@permanet.ie (plain) X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: : Request for modification of Argo Time base Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020805080407000401050205" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: S X-AOL-REROUTE: YES x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e4c89561146f6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------020805080407000401050205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So it's a case of managing to cross the pond .... and then give up ? Tony, EI8JK. On 09/09/2010 19:31, mal hamilton wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* mal hamilton > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Sent:* Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:18 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo Time base > > Stefan > If you need qrs 600 to communicate GIVE UP, its a ridiculous request,= =20 > no one has that amount of time to wait for a single digit. Think how=20 > long it would take for a proper QSO. > You are a late comer to LF and must understand the oceans have already= =20 > been spanned at speeds around QRS 60 and faster. A proper engineered=20 > station can communicate with the USA and Russia on normal CW. I have=20 > already achieved this on CW and QRS 3. > g3kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:37 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo Time base > > Hello Alberto, > > I have a question too: Is it possible to add a "QRSS-600" and/or a > "QRSS-300" mode? Many OMs are using your program which does a good > job (just as Rik's QRS program for transmitting). Those who want > to RX a VLF transmission in DFCW-600 cannot do that in ARGO > currently. > > If it would be easy and no problem for you to give out a new > release, it could be interesting for some :-) > > Best 73! > > Stefan/DK7FC > >> >> >> >> >> --------------020805080407000401050205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So it's a case of managing to cross the pond .... and then give up ?
Tony, EI8JK.

On 09/09/2010 19:31, mal hamilton wrote:
=C2=A0
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo Time base

Stefan
If you need qrs 600 to communicate=C2=A0GIVE UP, =C2=A0its a ridiculous request, no one= has that amount of time to wait for a single digit. Think how long it would take for a proper QSO.
You are a late comer to LF and must understand the oceans have already been spanned at speeds around=C2=A0=C2=A0QRS 60 and faster. A proper engineered station= can communicate with the USA and Russia=C2=A0on normal=C2=A0CW. I ha= ve already achieved this on CW and QRS 3.
g3kev
=C2=A0
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Request for modification of Argo Time base

Hello Alberto,

I have a question too: Is it possible to add a "QRSS-600" and/or a "QRSS-300" mode? Many OMs are using your program which does a good job (just as Rik's QRS program for transmitting). Those who want to RX a VLF transmission in DFCW-600 cannot do that in ARGO currently.

If it would be easy and no problem for you to give out a new release, it could be interesting for some :-)

Best 73!

Stefan/DK7FC





=C2=A0

--------------020805080407000401050205--