Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mi02.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.131.155]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB063-86484c889ba2355; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:32:34 -0400
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
by mtain-mi02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B35FA38000093;
Thu, 9 Sep 2010 04:32:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1OtcXQ-0008MA-N7
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:31:20 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1OtcXQ-0008M1-8Z
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:31:20 +0100
Received: from outbound02.telus.net ([199.185.220.221] helo=defout.telus.net)
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <sthed475@telus.net>)
id 1OtcXL-0004Ul-4o
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:31:21 +0100
Received: from edtnaa01.telusplanet.net ([75.157.170.89])
by priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net
(InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP
id <20100909083113.YSSL2462.priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net@edtnaa01.telusplanet.net>
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>;
Thu, 9 Sep 2010 02:31:13 -0600
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (d75-157-170-89.bchsia.telus.net [75.157.170.89])
by edtnaa01.telusplanet.net (BorderWare Security Platform) with ESMTP id 033A91F367991B4A
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 02:31:12 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4C889B50.4030902@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:31:12 +0000
From: Scott Tilley <sthed475@telus.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4C882E89.6080104@telus.net> <AANLkTimEJGZPrDQ3rR5yYgJ+6Ex7M+P=HW98qubuPo4W@mail.gmail.com> <4C88412B.4030307@telus.net> <4C888FAB.1080906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C888FAB.1080906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=dktIGNKqZPHC2SZ6t7rvd3azAPhhfi9RlLLEp5ybTf0= c=1 sm=0 a=6d4V6aXvmkYA:10 a=VlsvQeCHHzZYdozF1C9JGw==:17 a=gjHbtiOjAAAA:8 a=aatUQebYAAAA:8 a=hSD4HXz_6VhEWD1kVSEA:9 a=ARwoB5Z08D3KMQelgRxSr-BQX84A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=UAiAyl6XgLsA:10 a=rBKJJ2Jc0C4A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=yS_4ol2nMZA2K2tf3lkA:9 a=VVqlp2QinrGbftTHa4gA:7 a=l5VS8ESPx92G0L9PhFY-dYu-yRQA:4 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426
Subject: Re: LF: TIL bumping up the power...
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------050708010606040403050909"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_20_30,
HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039400cdeca4c889ba04309
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
--------------050708010606040403050909
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the link Stefan.
DCF39 made a brief appearance at sunset here. For the first time this=20
side of summer it pushed the DCF39 plot on my website up about 10dB over=
=20
the noise.
Last winter DCF39 was audible for hours at a time here!
73 Scott
On 9/9/2010 7:41 AM, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> With some imagination one can see a trace on my LD_DX grabber in the=20
> QRSS-120 window=20
> (http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html)=
=20
> arround 4 UTC at 137.778 kHz (still visible there). If the QRN would=20
> be 3 dB lower or propagation or your signal would be 3 dB better, it=20
> would be rather clear if it's your trace. I hope for the winther and=20
> some improvements on my side ;-)
>
> 73, GL, Stefan
>
>
>
> Am 09.09.2010 04:06, schrieb Scott Tilley:
>> Thanks Warren
>>
>> Oppps! So use to living in the milli world!
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/9/2010 1:11 AM, Warren Ziegler wrote:
>>> Scott,
>>> Surely you mean a conservative 0.5 W rather than 0.5 mW !
>>> --=20
>>> 73 Warren K2ORS
>>> WD2XGJ
>>> WD2XSH/23
>>> WE2XEB/2
>>> WE2XGR/1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Scott Tilley <sthed475@telus.net=20
>>> <mailto:sthed475@telus.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm going to bump up the juice from 400W to 1.1KW (MOALFA Stun
>>> mode) tonight. +4dB.
>>>
>>> 137778.0 +0.25Hz DAH, DFCW120, my sunset to sunrise.
>>>
>>> According to the my most conservative calculations that will be
>>> about 0.5mW ERP
>>>
>>> I may revert back to 400W if I have any sign of trouble.
>>>
>>> 73 Scott
>>> VE7TIL CN89dk
>>> http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
--------------050708010606040403050909
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Thanks for the link Stefan.<br>
<br>
DCF39 made a brief appearance at sunset here. For the first time
this side of summer it pushed the DCF39 plot on my website up about
10dB over the noise.<br>
<br>
Last winter DCF39 was audible for hours at a time here!<br>
<br>
73 Scott<br>
<br>
<br>
On 9/9/2010 7:41 AM, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4C888FAB.1080906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hello Scott, <br>
<br>
With some imagination one can see a trace on my LD_DX grabber in
the
QRSS-120 window
(<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html">http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html</a>)
arround 4 UTC at 137.778 kHz (still visible there). If the QRN
would be
3 dB lower or propagation or your signal would be 3 dB better, it
would
be rather clear if it's your trace. I hope for the winther and
some
improvements on my side ;-)<br>
<br>
73, GL, Stefan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 09.09.2010 04:06, schrieb Scott Tilley:
<blockquote cite="mid:4C88412B.4030307@telus.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Thanks Warren <br>
<br>
Oppps! So use to living in the milli world!<br>
<br>
Scott<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 9/9/2010 1:11 AM, Warren Ziegler wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:AANLkTimEJGZPrDQ3rR5yYgJ+6Ex7M+P=HW98qubuPo4W@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">Scott,
<div> </div>
<div> Surely you mean a conservative 0.5 W rather than 0.5
mW !<br>
-- <br>
73 Warren K2ORS<br>
WD2XGJ <br>
WD2XSH/23<br>
WE2XEB/2<br>
WE2XGR/1<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:47 PM,
Scott
Tilley <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:sthed475@telus.net">sthed475@telus.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm going to bump up the juice from 400W to 1.1KW
(MOALFA Stun mode)
tonight. +4dB.<br>
<br>
137778.0 +0.25Hz DAH, DFCW120, my sunset to sunrise.<br>
<br>
According to the my most conservative calculations that
will be about
0.5mW ERP<br>
<br>
I may revert back to 400W if I have any sign of trouble.<br>
<br>
73 Scott<br>
VE7TIL CN89dk<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/" target="_blank">http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------050708010606040403050909--