Message-ID: <4C4FF18B.1080702@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:59:55 -0500
From: Mike-WE0H <we0h@gmx.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <005601cb2dbf$c836d030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <AANLkTimE-TSi25-qNtv56W0eJDS=y=5Be2qq-6x3JeX0@mail.gmail.com> <007601cb2dc8$df5d8bb0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
In-Reply-To: <007601cb2dc8$df5d8bb0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Subject: LF: Re:  QSO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Maybe everyone is getting bored with TA signal reports every night. I 
mean, how many times do you have to cross the pond to get excited? 
Woohoo!!!

I find these Earth Antennas interesting reading. Who cares if someone 
with a 4kw amp can make his signal cross the pond on any band. Boring....

Mike-WE0H



mal  wrote:
> How could going backwards be Positive !!!! Check the records for years 
> gone by on 137 and look at what is happening today.
> I am but pointing out the facts, has no one learnt anything from 
>  information published over the past several years.
> I was getting 579 reports from NC1K years ago on 137 but today it seems 
> to be a struggle for some to be heard a few hundred metres away
> Prove me wrong ?
> g3kev
>  
> 
>     
>     *From: Roger L
> 
>     Wonderful Mal. Do you never have ANYTHING positive to say?
>     .
>     73s
>     Roger G3XBM

> 
>     On 27 July 2010 20:13, mal  wrote:
> 
>         There is no need for QRS around EU. In the past all EU was
>         worked on CW and daytime over 1000 miles plus on 137 kcs
>         Maybe QRS for N America/China and further afield.
>         QRS around EU is a backward step and certainly not progress,
>         and earthed antennas !!!  Need I say more?
>         g3kev