Message-ID: <4BC7200F.3070208@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:17:51 +0200
From: "Johan H. Bodin" <jh.bodin@telia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4D95FB39404AA04CA998E7F63B1A2E5F0432C756@esealmw110.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4D95FB39404AA04CA998E7F63B1A2E5F0432C756@esealmw110.eemea.ericsson.se>
Subject: Re: LF: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Daniele,

the ususal rule of thumb is that you don't need any preamplifier if you
get a big increase in the noise level when the antenna is connected.
It is best to make the comparison with a dummy load as "quiet reference"
since some receivers may not show their true noise floor when the input
is unterminated.

The RX noise floor become unimportant if it is 10..20dB or so below the
"natural" antenna noise.

73
Johan SM6LKM

----

Daniele Tincani wrote:
> Hi LF,
>=20
> =20
>=20
> Quite a general question: is a pre-amplifier needed in your opinion for
> listening to LF weak signals (e.g. NDB DX, etc.)?
>=20
> I read different opinions in very famous articles on the Web: one
> opinion is that a bigger non-amplified loop is better than a smaller
> amplified loop and an amplifier should be used only if really necessary
> (and only with the strictly required gain). On the contrary, another
> famous article says that an antenna pre-amplifier is important for NDB
> DX, despite it mentions quite a big loop as the antenna. I=92m just a
> beginner in LF and NDB listening with quite a simple system. I tried an
> homebrew amplifier together with my small loop and it seemed to me that
> it did not add anything but loudness to both the signal and the noise.
> Basically, no improvements in signal readability. What=92s your opinion,
> in particular when cheap portables (e.g. DE1103) are involved?
>=20
> =20
>=20
> Best regards
>=20
> Daniele