Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.135]) by air-di05.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDI051-eac64b93dc79fb; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:03:53 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dc07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C70BA380000B3; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:03:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NoJsK-0006C8-K6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:02:44 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NoJsK-0006Bz-99 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:02:44 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net ([165.212.64.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NoJsJ-0004wI-0d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:02:44 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net (co02-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout02.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33ED313413E for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:02:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmsapps03.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.132] by cmsout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.61T) with ESMTP id XID426ocgRcK5776X02; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:02:36 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.132 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps03.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID426ocgRcK5776X02 Received: from [192.168.1.3] [151.47.209.142] by cmsapps03.cms.usa.net (ESMTPA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.53P) with ESMTPA id 562ocgRch2672M39; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:02:33 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.47.209.142 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.1.3] Message-ID: <4B93DC26.1030602@usa.net> Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:02:30 +0100 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <238000.28750.qm@web86501.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <9afca2641003070747t66b57524v1bd630494b3d6fd5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9afca2641003070747t66b57524v1bd630494b3d6fd5@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Z-USANET-MsgId: XID562ocgRch2672X39 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40874b93dc775303 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) On 3/7/2010 4:47 PM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Thanks for all the responses on this. Some decent reasons have been > given to leave things just as they are, so I'm OK with that. Maybe just a little change could be done...the current size limit for attachments seems to be perhaps a bit restrictive... increasing it up to 60 - 70 kB could be useful, and at the same it will still continue to be a deterrent for not clogging the inboxes with oversize messages... 73 Alberto I2PHD