Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.204]) by air-mc08.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMC084-a98e4b630c6eb3; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:27:26 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0BB0B380001DF; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:27:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Natf8-0007cX-Rv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:25:38 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Natf8-0007cO-H1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:25:38 +0000 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Natf6-0001yK-U3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:25:38 +0000 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07ED2AC875 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:25:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmsapps01.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.136] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.61A) with ESMTP id XID678oaCqZd6398X01; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:25:29 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.136 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps01.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID678oaCqZd6398X01 Received: from [192.168.1.3] [151.47.217.94] by cmsapps01.cms.usa.net (ESMTPA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.53P) with ESMTPA id 989oaCqZb2672M36; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:25:27 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.47.217.94 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.1.3] Message-ID: <4B630BF4.4040500@usa.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:25:24 +0100 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <473484.31039.qm@web86505.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <20100129093032.BBBC031E702@smtps01.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <20100129093032.BBBC031E702@smtps01.kuleuven.be> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Z-USANET-MsgId: XID989oaCqZb2672X36 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Engineered Metamaterials Enable Remarkably Small Antennas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cc4b630c6b1a95 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) On 1/29/2010 10:30 AM, Rik Strobbe wrote: > Dear all, > > have a look at > http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/techbeat/tb2010_0126.htm#antenna . > They claim antennas with 95% efficiency and dimensions of only 2% of > the wavelength or less. But so only at VHF (300MHz) :-( > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T A follow-on to the EH contraption ? 73 Alberto I2PHD