Return-Path: Received: from rly-dg04.mx.aol.com (rly-dg04.mail.aol.com [172.19.151.88]) by air-dg01.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDG013-5c14b4ae3dd216; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:40:18 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dg04.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDG048-5c14b4ae3dd216; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:39:59 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NUFnb-00006V-Lf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:55 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NUFna-00006M-Tk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:54 +0000 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUFnZ-00047j-A6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:54 +0000 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20100111083847.CEDU17277.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:47 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.33] (really [82.22.242.219]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20100111083847.QYJC22934.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.2.33]> for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:47 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4B4AE394.31096.4FC469F@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1A8D@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <001d01ca920a$a07dfce0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>, <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1A8D@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=1ggfb5FlKZQUfF3vzm9UBYZ2uTfLsbs/8dSljwg5+mE= c=1 sm=0 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=RZhugd5bRANcwUbshbcA:9 a=PtFFXsx2s2MgNiz4F6FqLfz3j-wA:4 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: summer activity? Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Conditions are still OK in the summer and there is still LF activity. QRN is the main problem, and is best avoided by operating in the early morning. MIke, G3XDV =========== > Wonderful, that good activity theese weeks! But what about the summer? > I haven't been qrv in the summer yet. The qrm, how much stronger is > it? Just some db or is a qso in cw or qrss almost impossible? How much > does it affect the groundwave? I mean, is the qrm difference between > day and night much more than in the winter?