Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg06.mx.aol.com (rly-mg06.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.112]) by air-mg03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMG032-a1a4b276af73b0; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:54:52 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg06.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG064-a1a4b276af73b0; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:54:49 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NKV0w-0000z0-6E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:52:22 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NKV0v-0000yr-LL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:52:21 +0000 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NKV2X-00023I-Eb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:54:02 +0000 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20091215104855.JAVQ17277.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:48:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.33] (really [82.22.242.219]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20091215104855.RMEH2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.2.33]> for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:48:55 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:48:51 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4B276993.20102.2F3B53E@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC66@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <4B250D02.733.14E9A34@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E828AC66@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=1ggfb5FlKZQUfF3vzm9UBYZ2uTfLsbs/8dSljwg5+mE= c=1 sm=0 a=O9dtVte1ovYA:10 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=M_HgAKFWd3RFuGdMFhwA:9 a=khjKGsC3Q3Vw4avutksQ3pI76dYA:4 a=HoX5Jy1NpWjuyRrJ:21 a=p_wtBvFYH2H4AFiB:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: AW: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10? Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 On 15 Dec 2009 at 11:03, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > If the "gain" or better said SNR between qrss30 and qrss3 is 10dB, so > can I do a QSO to VK with 1W TX Power and an antenna efficiency of > 1/1000 if I choose QRSS10000000000? That's a litte jokingly formulated > but you know what I mean. In other words, where are the limitations of > this rule?=20 =20 This is certainly theoretically possible, but only if 'ground-wave'=20 is being used. If you are using sky-wave - as all intercontinental=20 QSOs have so far - you are limited by the length of time that the=20 path is open. Between UK and eastern US, this is a maximum of a few=20 hours, but often very much less, which is why the speed must be a=20 compromise between length of the 'opening' and the length to transmit=20 the information. This compromise usually result in using QRSS60.=20 Between Europe and VK/ZL any 'opening' is likely to be only a few=20 minutes making a two-way QSO extremely difficult. > So, qsos could be done much faster if choosing 10x the > power and stay in qrss3. The additional advantage would be, if I try > to do a TA QSO I could just stay in the region of 137.7 and those who > are qrv in qrss3 and only watch the qrss3-sector would get a nice > signal and thus more fascination for the LF-hobby=20 Yes, in theory, and very occasionally over the last few years VE/US=20 beacons have been recorded at QRSS3. In the UK, a few stations can=20 manage to transmit 1W ERP. Despite that, there is no evidence of a=20 QRSS3 two-way across the Atlantic.=20 =20 I suggest you monitor the US beacon transmissions around 137.777kHz=20 each night. These are very well engineered high power stations and=20 you will be surprised how difficult the path is, even at their speeds=20 of about QRSS60..=20 Better still, try running some overnight transmissions of your own -=20 there are US stations who will monitor for you if you announce it to=20 this group. Good luck. Mike, G3XDV =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D