Return-Path: Received: from rly-mc12.mx.aol.com (rly-mc12.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.96]) by air-mc01.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMC011-da94b086c8a2fa; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:41:24 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mc12.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMC121-da94b086c8a2fa; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:41:16 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NBych-0003m4-7Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:07 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NBycg-0003lv-SR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:06 +0000 Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NBycg-0002f7-AU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:06 +0000 Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmYAAA77B0uQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACZJ4JgAQELCyQGn0CXFII9gX8E X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,264,1257120000"; d="scan'208";a="54921028" Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2009 22:40:00 +0000 Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nALMe0ex021955; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:00 GMT Received: from Stewarts-Computer-2.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id nALMdxD12149; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:39:59 GMT Message-ID: <4B086C3F.3080309@g3ysx.org.uk> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:39:59 +0000 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <785212.33618.qm@web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <785212.33618.qm@web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: WSPR BEACONS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) M0FMT wrote: > I am with Mal. WSPR has no place on the UK 501 / 504 Kc/s Amateur > /_Communication_/ Band. The Norwegian Licence has got it right - CW only! > > 73 petefmt This is not what Ofcom calls it. In their recent consultation they say: "Agenda Item 1.23 - Amateur Service in parts of the band 415 – 526.5 kHz "5.19 Radio amateurs use radio for experimental purposes and to provide communications in support of emergency services in some situations." So unless we are supporting an emergency, 500KHz seems to be a band for us to conduct experiments on. - Stewart/G3YSX