Return-Path: Received: from rly-mc09.mx.aol.com (rly-mc09.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.93]) by air-mc01.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMC014-d934afda61b24d; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:32:15 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mc09.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMC093-d934afda61b24d; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:31:56 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N90v5-0004QT-8S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:30:51 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N90v4-0004QK-Rq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:30:50 +0000 Received: from mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.38]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N90v4-0008Tu-AL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:30:50 +0000 X-Trace: 268652937/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$PIPEX-ACCEPTED/pipex-temporary-group/79.71.207.20/None/m0afj@dsl.pipex.com X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.71.207.20 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: m0afj@dsl.pipex.com X-SMTP-AUTH: X-MUA: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkMBAKYx/UpPR88U/2dsb2JhbAAI1hyEPAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,738,1249254000"; d="scan'208";a="268652937" X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from 79-71-207-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [10.0.0.4]) ([79.71.207.20]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2009 18:30:43 +0000 Message-ID: <4AFDA5D9.9010704@dsl.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:30:49 +0000 From: tim hague User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <00df01ca6488$e9244a80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> In-Reply-To: <00df01ca6488$e9244a80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: PIRATES Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) mal hamilton wrote: > Lots of pirates reported around the east african coast and Indian > ocean but now Radio pirates !!!! on 500. > How would one know a Pirate? their style of sending on cw or the way > they WSPR. > Beware of the WSPR merchants no ID just carriers switching on/off as > far as the casual radio amateur is concerned. Instead of a simple > approach worldwide to issue Radio Amateur licences for the > traditional CW mode on 500, appliance operator licences were issued > for Broadcast modes ie > CW beacons, Data beacons, and other transmissions, which must stop at > Country Borders and must not be reported by anyone hearing such > transmissions beyond these Borders. > In other words the whole 500 khz business is Chaotic, whereas the > other MF allocation 160 metres is orderly and sensibly regulated using > in the main CW and SSB. > It would appear the appropriate license authorities do not think the > Appliance Operator has much to contribute to the advancement or > research on 500. > The marine service has been using the band for the past 100 years and > has exhausted all possibilities and concluded it is of no further use, > with the advancement of Satellite communications technology. > 500 in EU seems to be a fun band for WSPR Beacons where no operator > participation is required just unattended machines belching out bits > of data and generating QRM to the few Radio amateurs trying to get by > on CW. > Let us have your opinion. > De G3KEV > > > > Call for the men in white coats :)