Return-Path: Received: from rly-mf06.mx.aol.com (rly-mf06.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.176]) by air-mf02.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMF022-9664afcc9832d; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:51:03 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mf06.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMF064-9664afcc9832d; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:50:45 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8mE9-0000Z7-7y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:49:33 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8mE8-0000Yy-Sk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:49:32 +0000 Received: from defout.telus.net ([199.185.220.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8mE7-0002W7-UG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:49:32 +0000 Received: from edtnaa01.telusplanet.net ([75.157.140.241]) by priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20091113024928.FCYS760.priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net@edtnaa01.telusplanet.net> for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:49:28 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.67] (d75-157-140-241.bchsia.telus.net [75.157.140.241]) by edtnaa01.telusplanet.net (BorderWare Security Platform) with ESMTP id 2FD3B2E0A789201E for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:49:27 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4AFCC936.9060800@telus.net> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:49:26 -0800 From: Scott Tilley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <2EB9AB3966984B91BB0C369B32CF12FC@AGB> In-Reply-To: <2EB9AB3966984B91BB0C369B32CF12FC@AGB> X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Graham All Canadian 600m stations are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental Licenses and are not able to communicate with the Amateur Service. The sad truth and why the entire experimental program in Canada is a waste of time. 73 Scott VE7TIL Graham wrote: > Can anyone clarify the situation as to who can work who > is this the same as the USA ? > > Tnx - G .. > > From the IARU web site > > As of 30 October 2009 Canada issued two licences in the Developmental > Service in the range 504-509 kHz. > > * VE1ZZ has been assigned VX9PSO and is reported on 504.6 kHz > * VO1NA has been assigned VX9MRC and is reported on 507.77 and > 508.5 kHz > > Two more stations, VE3OHH and VE7BDQ, are expected to become active soon. > >