Message-ID: <4AA9AE90.7070109@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:57:36 -0400
From: John Andrews <w1tag@charter.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <211F6B38DA2544AD84B814000D47EDF6@AGB> <0F69884C983F4F198A9B4B4F276326AD@radiorummet> <171181B694684DD8A9131D31D307EB5B@JimPC> <000001ca326f$b6ce1c00$0b01a8c0@weazle>
In-Reply-To: <000001ca326f$b6ce1c00$0b01a8c0@weazle>
Subject: Re: LF: Wolf Config Settings
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


J.B.,

For work at 500 kHz, I'd be tempted to go no longer than 16 frames. I'm 
beginning to think that the fast fades and poorer phase stability hurt 
the build-up of copy. While you may get your first clear copy on the 
31st line, I'll bet that you would have gotten it quicker by flushing 
things out earlier.

That said, 8 lines appears to be too short for any reasonable copy of 
M0BMU here. I used 12 earlier in the week with decent results, and have 
gone back to it.

John, W1TAG

J. B. Weazle McCreath wrote:
> Hello LFers,
> 
> What are most of you fellows setting your Nr of frames value at
> in the Wolf Config screen?  How important is this setting as to
> its effect on decodes?  Thanks in advance for any/all replies.
> 
> 73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL
> Solar and wind powered
> Lowfer " EAR"  188.830
> EN93dr
> 
> http://www.hurontel.on.ca/~weazle
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.90/2361 - Release Date: 09/10/09 18:12:00
>