Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u4GDKr9T001022 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:20:54 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1b2IOc-00034T-Aw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:17:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1b2IOc-00034K-25 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:17:18 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1b2IOa-0004el-AN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 14:17:16 +0100 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.132.143]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LgdBZ-1bP2Uv27Vd-00o1ML for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:17:13 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <8b2344de-d86c-6b40-4ef3-765d763230a3@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <8b2344de-d86c-6b40-4ef3-765d763230a3@t-online.de> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:17:08 +0200 Message-ID: <49D4FB7A1BD54CA89F26809F1BFBAD22@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdGvcWMlYN7dsUctRYyjZjI2kEUSuAAAwIOQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NY/Mtm0NrTNeuwRvZrz8c2gr6nWc1huF/M+E4uD4uR9qXhC1/Fb E0xjMjmYHg96BqdzoUqb2b9GHwY0SdD8N28Dr0+2RsLVBwqI/6aSlEUFUch4NXYjwXoYDnB Co8as+LDAXBvc+xU0rZZ4HNF/XW9NcFe7vqkQ8fqfUTXstCqWyQ1l7eaXoi2JT3wVO1CGIu 8kPmwi3uPFu7QuyL6HjDA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:vr2MorYuxF0=:pNNYfsDlwG0MOqQhYjAvIu lnImQhY/nJd+Vq9vl+mtD2o97X7deqvRhr/LI4Bg0ELaxbr2g1cXoywL7XlP4nxAnQvtSJpqO 50+rCoylVHzzxK8knArVY+Ln1CXM5EvkFxBJDXwW1OwUPnEpXm8DEC7wFHoML4FkJza4yBXdt 3I/r58JTnrIKY/RDHg7JCZPLKNyEoh3mULCq4c+RZ9+4ge1f4gHOMFBGl7NkKub+IxSdIiunk KjCQLstj34oPJFgDe+90t5ow+jcN/rTLPGpwXo0ykpgLG8cpwtzG3y3seVGgQPHol/pxtQgZF 1ls5gCdUVucswGKAPQJAdQi6CRJ5Tv/z/vKUS2KVdMFxstpB/1HraNiN7pn8DNyk7IQwbV6Nz gyY9qFo0hU4un/VAASBEzrzKNzga0Co9pzPsc+3LYQ9aElXGQBBt2DWeX4/JkAsRZbaUYs/EW 7Ni2t30UzAnXs16AUKW9px1n8aA2F+v5BFyUiztYlrhTcZgR7IUDan3Di4hZaArYBheLFbBNR O6UIkpz4AsITPcIBC21kqnO2fGJ7cZSi/ERdjDl8SAJRKXPZusWmcdAgTFzm4B1msq/kEeq4i we/9n/sKPl/bSB5zgaCRMbtC6OZR8016OE7ENSLmXidH36TZgOjXzVA0m2GNW1/ikPQsrBOYl xPtm4Q6Iy17Uvid4+EjG3GlMh9kl37PBonJQyjWrqwLs8787VmMuXuMbf91IbrCz1FXDnvCFG 2d6yRRQn1cqBFnvYhqaeLyq+UBxgt0Ho17s0xlJRAHcg8Xmq9BLYK2nR6SQLAlIjD/TMcOWQ0 OozbDqt X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: LF: RE: DL0IL daytime signal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8091 Hi Wolf, Among other spotters I could decode DL0IL today at 06.20z (daylight) in WSPR mode at a distance of 465km which was the greatest distance at this time, with quite a good SNR margin of stiil -18dB. 2016-05-16 06:20 DL0IL 0.475690 -18 0 JO30pl 0.5 DL4RAJ JN68kj 465 118 Probably he went off air afterwards? 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dr. >Wolf Ostwald >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 2:48 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: LF: DL0IL daytime signal > >g`day everyone > >after QSOing dl0il/p several times during darkness, we made a sked for >daytime. 08zulu. > >Their signal was down by an s-unit in daylight, but it sounded like it >had multipathing on it. Not very strong but noticeable here. No >explanation for it on my end. And i guess of no importance >anyways, but >it shows that daytime coverage exists to a good extent. QSB as >well was >down from signals in darkness considerably. > > >73 wolf df2py > >