Return-Path: Received: from rly-md09.mx.aol.com (rly-md09.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.147]) by air-md07.mail.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILINMD071-92849af4ef53b1; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:03:27 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md09.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD098-92849af4ef53b1; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:03:07 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Lf4mg-0005ou-HB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:02:10 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Lf4mf-0005ol-Pu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:02:09 +0000 Received: from smtp101.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.40]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lf4me-00022T-Mj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:02:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 6510 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2009 04:02:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=n6DQorgsTqHny8x9bdvvRPE5kj8rzyLYZTpEGYSKWRjL0cARgKOcjO98OxWSakS40wo1IpQ8pFtjqm73vxMw5W0VxKw2bQDyJvij8SlU0IoSC4iOrPz0LUChxHEmLOwKe71JZVqFQMCt5D0VIcGQJXQ3s6NbOWVn2sVmvzJzgGQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (we0h@75.168.155.28 with plain) by smtp101.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2009 04:02:01 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: WJJ6XmsVM1kKqetqLr5ucKkYCK_nZXFkw3z9vbjf2DCK20MTzo4y5qM.AbJ4FOvHc4vB1zGHfU2Rx4PAsmgc3izJx4dWYKwMNOufOIJ9.5KJ9atMk0NYHp4FEwNkyyKOO8ysPLnKsO3uCVz_r2_Ik7XNalxLcHAox1dggZdcS4YOlsCdJssdKdvgs8Io4g-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <49AF4EB7.5020801@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:01:59 -0600 From: Mike-WE0H User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, 600MRG References: <000a01c99a91$a54a1180$1402a8c0@e7010> In-Reply-To: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: 600MRG> Deep copy... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) I have run the '930 with the AGC off many times. It does pick out signals deeper in the noise floor that way. I have noticed that with using the 270hz first IF filter, that it can pull signals out of the noise very easy. More easy than running no AGC? I don't have that answer yet. Mike WE0H dave.riley3 wrote: > *I seem to get best results while trying to pull signals out of the > noise when the AGC of the receiver is OFF as well as the Noise Blanker > and Noise reduction features being OFF...* > ** > *Do you concur??* > > *Also setting a good audio filter to the passband of interest seems to > bypass some heavy static hits as well...* > > *Wat Sa OM ??* > > > *TNX from Dave @ WD2XSH/17* > > >