Return-Path: Received: from rly-df10.mx.aol.com (rly-df10.mail.aol.com [172.19.156.23]) by air-df01.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINDF011-584497d97353d0; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:58:02 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-df10.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDF107-584497d97353d0; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:57:58 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRP9M-0002yV-17 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:57:04 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRP9L-0002yM-LW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:57:03 +0000 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRP9K-0005Dq-M6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:57:03 +0000 Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090126105656.XWKW2989.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:56:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.33] (really [82.22.240.81]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090126105656.QAND21638.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.2.33]>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:56:56 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: "Gary - G4WGT" , rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:56:52 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <497D96F4.25218.6024F9@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: <00f101c97f2d$e530b440$6401a8c0@asus> References: <20090125092908.0aec06a4@lurcher>, , <00f101c97f2d$e530b440$6401a8c0@asus> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=9YlaCzn6_68A:10 a=Uq6Z4JIH76HPEVqZA30A:9 a=OLWKDNbiV9jlTrMEGcyYnDZ4-i4A:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 On 25 Jan 2009 at 20:45, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > My comment was to follow the WSPR recommended method as adopting ERP > would mean there are two "standards". The current WSPR system is already approximatley ERP as at HF the difference between RF and ERP is unlikely to be more than a few dB. Mike, G3XDV =========