Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-da07.mx.aol.com (rly-da07.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.81]) by air-da02.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA024-a7b493c1516144; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:25:39 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-da07.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDA073-a7b493c1516144; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:25:28 -0500
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1L9OJB-0001DN-HS
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:24:45 +0000
Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1L9OJ9-0001DE-P0
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:24:43 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140])
	by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>)
	id 1L9OJ9-0003zX-0f
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:24:43 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,730,1220227200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="27909271"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139])
  by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2008 18:24:20 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150])
	by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mB7IOKrU005851;
	Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:24:20 +0100
Received: from stewart-bryants-computer.local (ams3-vpn-dhcp5476.cisco.com [10.61.85.99])
	by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mB7IOJkk027571;
	Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:24:20 GMT
Message-ID: <493C14D2.3030406@g3ysx.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:24:18 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <fc7eccec0812050822x39e4cc98xc36b36cf0e73d6fa@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fc7eccec0812050822x39e4cc98xc36b36cf0e73d6fa@mail.gmail.com>
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=stewart@g3ysx.org.uk; dkim=neutral
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none
Subject: Re: LF: E field active antennas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)


Andy Talbot wrote:
> Having just had to make an active antenna for HF (for gainful
> employment-type work, not Am. radio purposes. The commercially made
> one we've ordered is on five weeks delivery and it was needed before
> yesterday) I was wondering about a helical element.
> 
> As the thing had to be resonably lightweight, I made the antenna
> element from copper tape on 15mm plastic water pipe rather than use a
> solid copper tube.  Just for a bit of novelty I wound the tape in a
> helix, but then started wondering if doing that would make any
> difference to performance.    Normally, helically winding an antenna
> (rubber duck type at V/UHF) only serves to distribute loading
> inductance into a short antenna to make it resonate - unlikely to
> change improve the loss terms at all.  But I did wonder if the added
> extra inductance, or increased conductor length (not element length -
> that is 1.2m) would change the performance significantly from a
> straight tube.


The voltage V to the fet will be a function of L
the antenna length.

The attenuation in the input circuit will be

Cfet/(Cant + Cfet)

So shortening a given strip of copper by wrapping
it in a helix will reduce V whilst keeping the
attenuation the same.

You would do better to either run the tape straight
to the same linear length which will increase the
voltage in the ratio StraightLenght/WrappedLength,
or fill in the gap in the helix which will increase
the voltage to the fet in the ratio
(GapArea + CopperArea)/CopperArea.

One problem with wrapping the copper around the outside
is that you make the antenna more sensitive to rain noise at
LF - or so I recall from the Decca folks.

Stewart/G3YSX