Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F35B038000091;
Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:17:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1StQuj-0006Qs-5U
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:15:41 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1StQui-0006Qj-JH
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:15:40 +0100
Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk)
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>)
id 1StQug-0005i4-VJ
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:15:39 +0100
Received: from AGB ([2.26.16.57])
by mwinf5d11 with ME
id dyFd1j0061DsCNS03yFdt3; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:15:38 +0200
Message-ID: <48CD7FE7D0EA469DACB1AAB0B4F048BC@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <BEF83442013E483A8C290CBCA65A2B5D@AGB> <500C40DA.7080808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <FE62EA0AB9174D09BFE211BA0BFF0704@AGB> <500C723E.7070409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <DFD8BD5BC3F8463598BA2602D39F8191@AGB> <359024010D8640938234BFC3BA2C265C@White> <001701cd6915$d848ece0$8cd9160a@EFREMOV>
In-Reply-To: <001701cd6915$d848ece0$8cd9160a@EFREMOV>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:15:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Thanks Andrey Yes , change from OP8 to OP32 , or any of the
2 speeds for the other bands , the audio frequency band changes .. Check
the frequency pull down list for frequency , or can use the waterfall and
pointer to measure the audio frequency [...]
Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE
X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b
Subject: Re: LF: Good OP8 results .. Q 136 OP32 Test ?
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:498157600:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db406500dcd606943
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
Thanks Andrey
Yes , change from OP8 to OP32 , or any of the 2 speeds for the
other bands , the audio frequency band changes ..
Check the frequency pull down list for frequency , or can use the
waterfall and pointer to measure the audio frequency
This is automated in the windows application
73-G..
--------------------------------------------------
From: "rn3agc" <rn3agc@mail.ru>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 9:56 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: Good OP8 results .. Q 136 OP32 Test ?
> GE Markus,
>
> Frequencies for Op8: 137600-137700. Therefore transmitting remained
> "unnoticed".
> The trace of your op32-signal was visible in a 3s-window.
>
> 73
> Andrey
>
>
>>Hi Graham,
>>
>>yes, I've been testing two rounds of "homemade" opera-32 on 137.590 kHz,
>>0.6 W ERP. Also had a go at opera-8 in the middle (ending
>>22:25) which apparently went unnoticed.
>>
>>PSK reporter surely has no idea of where I live, and for some reason it
>>erroneously located me at IO91UX (incidentally the QTH of
>>M0FMT). Thus the distances on the web are not correct.
>>
>>BTW is it possible to read the SNR off pskmap as well, or only from the
>>application? -39 dB on Opera's "slightly biased average
>>power scale" would mean -35 dB carrier vs noise in 2.5 kHz. Which would be
>>+14 dB SNR in 30 mHz, ie. a comfortable "O" in QRSS-30,
>>and probably readable in QRSS-10 as well.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Markus (DF6NM in Nuernberg JN59NJ)
>>
>>PS just noticed that TF3HZ has managed to capture my second op-32
>>transmission (ending 23:07). This should be about 2540 km or so.
>
>