Return-Path: Received: from rly-mh03.mx.aol.com (rly-mh03.mail.aol.com [172.21.166.139]) by air-mh03.mail.aol.com (v121.5) with ESMTP id MAILINMH033-bc84820882b50; Tue, 06 May 2008 12:32:58 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mh03.mx.aol.com (v121.5) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMH038-bc84820882b50; Tue, 06 May 2008 12:32:46 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JtQ5J-0007MB-Or for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 17:32:09 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JtQ5I-0007M2-59 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 17:32:08 +0100 Received: from gateout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.21]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JtQ5E-0006BN-3C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 17:32:08 +0100 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net (cmsout02.mbox.net [165.212.64.32]) by gateout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FAA73416A for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 16:31:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmsapps02.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.138] by cmsout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.34P) with ESMTP id XID798meFqf25105X02; Tue, 06 May 2008 16:31:53 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.138 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps02.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID798meFqf25105X02 Received: from [192.168.1.3] [151.47.218.179] by cmsapps02.cms.usa.net (ESMTPA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.40M) with ESMTPA id 426meFqfz0181M38; Tue, 06 May 2008 16:31:51 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.47.218.179 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.1.3] Message-ID: <482087F5.4060400@usa.net> Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 18:31:49 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6f5efq$bag0ch@ip01.eastlink.ca> <004c01c8aeed$a825a260$0d00000a@AGB> <007401c8aef5$41936b60$0301a8c0@g3kev> <003f01c8aefb$8c023b80$0d00000a@AGB> <481F9F0E.4050301@usa.net> <006001c8af8f$7353b930$0e00000a@AGB> In-Reply-To: <006001c8af8f$7353b930$0e00000a@AGB> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Z-USANET-MsgId: XID426meFqf10181X38 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: Survival Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Graham wrote: > Smoke signals..... I would think a slight problem would be finding something > that would burn or if you did , distinguishing it from everything else that > was burning ? That could be addressed with the use of a strong encryption code, which could also solve the problem of onlookers... A sort of public key RSA, where you have the guarantee of the authenticity of the sender. Or more simply, a set of smoke signals could be used as a preamble for the subsequent message... 73 Alberto I2PHD