Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd01.mx.aol.com (rly-dd01.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.148]) by air-dd08.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD082-b5c480d15903ab; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:31:05 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd01.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD016-b5c480d15903ab; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:30:44 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Jo4Wj-0003cH-3s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:30:21 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Jo4Wi-0003c8-GG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:30:20 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jo4We-0001Q3-Ob for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:30:20 +0100 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01.mbox.net [165.212.64.31]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705A95064 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:30:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmsapps01.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.136] by cmsout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.34P) with ESMTP id XID374mDuwEH1653X01; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:30:07 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.136 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps01.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID374mDuwEH1653X01 Received: from [192.168.1.3] [151.47.221.162] by cmsapps01.cms.usa.net (ESMTPA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.40M) with ESMTPA id 662mDuwEF0175M36; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:30:05 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.47.221.162 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.1.3] Message-ID: <480D156B.4010103@usa.net> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:30:03 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005601c8a3fd$aaebe9a0$0900a8c0@AM> In-Reply-To: <005601c8a3fd$aaebe9a0$0900a8c0@AM> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Z-USANET-MsgId: XID662mDuwEF0175X36 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.207 Subject: Re: LF: Reflector problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Alan Melia wrote: > > To Dave's comment I dont think Yahoo is any better it has had some pretty > bad problems over the last year or so, and there is quite a lot of > resistance to their intrusive registration data requirements. Hi Alan, just my two cents about Yahoo. While it maybe wants to know a bit too much about you, for the rest it is today much better than a couple of years ago, I administer three lists on Yahoo, and frankly never had a problem. A few attempts of spam were correctly identified by the spam filters, and routed to me, as administrator, for approval or rejection. But, as our US friends use to say, YMMV .... 73 Alberto I2PHD