Return-Path: Received: from rly-ma02.mx.aol.com (rly-ma02.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.46]) by air-ma03.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMA034-8954b257d08c7; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:47:31 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-ma02.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMA027-8954b257d08c7; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:47:21 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NJy7x-0002uB-3J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:45:25 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NJy7w-0002u2-Nb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:45:24 +0000 Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.40]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NJy8b-0007ZW-7f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:46:06 +0000 Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBDNjtUD025069 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:45:55 -0500 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id l.c16.768cab25 (43915) for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:45:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from Black (g229182214.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.229.182.214]) by cia-dc08.mx.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC084-ab8b4b257caf24d; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:45:52 -0500 Message-ID: <47E8873B5C254CA9A406AA345E229ED6@Black> From: "Markus Vester" To: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:45:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16669 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: MarkusVester@aol.com X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.236 Subject: LF: WSPR 2.0 samplerate Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA7C56.C87FC990" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA7C56.C87FC990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear LF, I have recently installed WSPR 2.0 on one older XP machine and found= that decodes were erratic, and the frequency readout was about 10 Hz= high. The reason seems to be that the input samplerate is about 0.6= % low. The output samplerate is however correct. The strange thing is that this samplerate error was not present with= the former version 1.12. I now have the two versions running simultan= eously side by side, on the same machine with the same soundcard. WSPR= 1.12 is producing perfect decodes on the correct frequency, whereas= 2.0 reproducibly shows the described effects. It looks like the new= version somehow accesses the soundcard differently. Has anybody else experienced this? Best 73, Markus, DF6NM ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA7C56.C87FC990 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear LF,
 
I have recently installed WSPR 2.0 on= one older XP=20 machine and found that decodes were erratic, and the fr= equency=20 readout was about 10 Hz high. The reason seems to be that the inp= ut=20 samplerate is about 0.6 % low. The output samplerate is however=20 correct.
 
The strange thing is that this sample= rate error was=20 not present with the former version 1.12. I now have the two vers= ions=20 running simultaneously side by side, on the same machine with the same= =20 soundcard. WSPR 1.12 is producing perfect decodes on the correct= frequency,=20 whereas 2.0 reproducibly shows the described effects. It looks like the new version somehow access= es the soundcard=20 differently.
 
Has anybody else experienced this?
 
Best 73,
Markus, DF6NM
 
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CA7C56.C87FC990--