Return-Path: Received: from rly-mc03.mail.aol.com (rly-mc03.mail.aol.com [172.20.118.145]) by air-mc04.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMC44-113477e180613c; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:27:16 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mc03.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMC35-113477e180613c; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:27:04 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JAkg3-0004J4-Mv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:25:27 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JAkg2-0004Iv-WC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:25:26 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JAkfy-0002p2-Vk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:25:26 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.21] (helo=11.mx.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAkfd-0005bN-Sn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:25:01 +0100 Received: from f051069201.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.51.69.201]:1344 helo=[192.168.0.111]) by 11.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.68 #1) id 1JAkfd-0004sH-NN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:25:01 +0100 Message-ID: <477E178F.4000907@freenet.de> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:25:03 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Wolfgang_B=FCscher?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003801c84e2a$8dd1f7c0$0100a8c0@W1KW> <019601c84e51$9ef47ec0$6401a8c0@p4> <001501c84e64$f67e0810$0d00000a@AGB> In-Reply-To: <001501c84e64$f67e0810$0d00000a@AGB> X-Karma: -1000: sorbs.safe: if-match(0) => return-bad(1.0) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: GM4ISM 500KHz Grabber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hello Mark, I guess the problem with the Javascrip refresh method is this: The javascript begins to update the screen, regardless of the transfer speed. Even if the previous update isn't finished, it begins a new update. If, for example, the transfer of the image requires 25 seconds, but the Javascript tries to update it every 2 seconds, there will be endless activity but no new screen because the embedded image is only update when it's complete (this reduces flicker, and is the main difference between the javascript page, and the simple java-less page which updates itself through an html meta tag) . What Graham could try is to enter a larger value in the "Refresh Interval" box at the bottom of the screen (on Mark's "index" page with the 500 kHz spectrogram). For example, set the update interval to 30 seconds (the default was 2 seconds, which was my mistake, because 2 second refresh only works through a local network). As long as you permanently see the message "transferrig data from 82.something" on the bottom of your browser (but never the "Ready"), you know that your browser requests the image too often. With 30 second refresh, I get a stable periodic refresh from Mark's MF viewer. If we have a Javascript expert here: Any idea how a Javascript (embedded in an HTML document) can detect if all embedded graphics have been updated ? In that case, the "refresh" interval could be restarted after the previous refresh is finished. Best regards, Wolfgang "Wolf" DL4YHF . Graham schrieb: > Mark, > > Just had a look, but only seeing a small strip at the top of the > screen, which is flickering , only way to view full page, is to > click on the 'slow' link .. > > Graham .. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mark > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:43 PM > *Subject:* LF: GM4ISM 500KHz Grabber > > Gents, > Thanks to Wolfgang DL4YHF, the grabber at my QTH is now running a > new beta version of Spectrum lab, that should stop the problem of > multiple users getting partial images. > After an initial rush of activity, the number of users has calmed > down, rather as expected. > Feel free to jump on board and try to break it again! > The system is connected to my main antenna but this is at minimum > height and not correctly matched. Still it works pretty well and > many signals were visible last night. > I have also got the magnetic antenna working, (placed temporarily > on the shed roof) and it will be re-mounted when the weather > permits, it seems slightly better than the reduced height main > antenna. > > I dont have the fantastically low noise floor that John GM4SLV > offers, but I hope to leave the grabber running for the duration > of the UK experiment or longer, if it is considerd useful. It is > far enough away from other grabbers to perhaps be of some use for > the experiment. It is also a testing ground for possible similar > systems at SHF giving 'inverse' beacons for propagation indication. > > any comments or problems encounterd, please let me know! > Regards > Mark GM4ISM > www.dc2light.co.uk > follow the MF / LF link, at the bottom of the page is the grabber > link. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1207 - Release Date: > 1/2/2008 11:29 >