Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20;
From: "Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:21:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <46C61169.28563.331D674@dave.davesergeant.com>
In-reply-to: <000201c7e101$eb2f48f0$8700a8c0@rtv5f9d8dfdf44>
References: <000201c7e101$eb2f48f0$8700a8c0@rtv5f9d8dfdf44>
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: LF: [500] Beacon_OK0EMW
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

On 17 Aug 2007 at 21:07, Lubom=EDr Bobal=EDk wrote:

> Thanks to Czech Telecommunication Office (CTO), particularly
> Department of Frequency Spectrum Management and the director of this
> office, I have obtained permission for the beacon OK0EMW experimental
> operation:
> 
> Frequency:       505.060kHz

Well listening up there with my two ears there is total cacophony 
around that frequency. DI2AM and DI2BE both solid 579 and there is at 
least one other down below, whether it is OK0EMW I don't know.... 
further down the band is G0MRF beaconing (599), GI4PDE (589), 
GW3UEP(579).

Had a half QSO with Rog GW3UEP earlier - he came straight back when I 
called him after his CQ, at which time he was 579. But QSB set in and 
we lost each other very quickly. Obviously around dusk conditions are 
quite variable so you have to be quick.. but thanks for the QSO Rog, 
quite encouraging and hopefully it will be 100% next time.

73 Dave G3YMC

http://www.davesergeant.com