Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
From: "Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:38:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <46B07ECB.3335.151C3A6@dave.davesergeant.com>
In-reply-to: <000b01c7d428$8d3e5000$86048351@w4o8m9>
References: <006b01c7d3ba$78370d00$0300a8c0@lark>, <000b01c7d428$8d3e5000$86048351@w4o8m9>
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

On 1 Aug 2007 at 11:41, James Moritz wrote:

> 
> Dear Dave, LF Group,
> 
> > And another point which worries me. Are we allowed to operate
> > unattended beacons on the band?
> 
> I don't think there have been any unattended beacons on 500kHz. The
> licence says "unattended" is where the licencee is at a different
> location from the equipment - as far as I know, all the beacon
> transmissions on 500k have been from people's usual QTHs.
> 
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
> 
> 

Not quite.... 

17(mm) - "Unattended Operation" means the operation of Radio 
Equipment by the Licensee when the LICENSEE is in a different 
location to where the Radio Equipment is installed:

This includes the case where the equipment is at the home address but 
the licensee is not there (because he has gone out...).

I notice also from Schedule 2 that 136kHz is not one of the bands 
where unattended operation of beacons is allowed.

73 Dave G3YMC


http://www.davesergeant.com