X-GM-THRID: 1243046961577795995 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.87.11 with SMTP id k11cs12309wxb; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.51.2 with SMTP id y2mr1279122fgy.1185464236565; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 34si7218530nfu.2007.07.26.08.37.11; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IE5LG-0006oh-9b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:33:30 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IE5LF-0006oY-Rc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:33:29 +0100 Received: from smtp813.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.73]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IE5LE-0007zX-Do for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:33:29 +0100 Received: (qmail 33639 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2007 15:33:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Dave) (dsergeant@btinternet.com@81.157.212.26 with login) by smtp813.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2007 15:33:22 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 1KcJ7ucVM1keTx5n90RS_8SictM5cQDBRDRRbwyxN1jxK.5OtZDH6jc5UWtROx0SyAKUim1GsCb2n9AcYtbHBsGKyTUo8_GF_qkWQbbyw_7VNpYv From: "Dave Sergeant" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:33:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <46A8CCD3.2806.22EC818@dave.davesergeant.com> In-reply-to: <31599.12389.qm@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <31599.12389.qm@web86402.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.081 Subject: Re: LF: BEACON - G3XIZ - 503.947 - BAND PLAN Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 650 On 26 Jul 2007 at 15:55, CHRISTOPHER OSBORN wrote: > I've been calling CQ on CW for quite a while but had no takers so will > be beaconing QRSS3 on 503.947 kHz for an hour or so. > > As usual all reports are welcome. > I can beacon through the night if anyone would derive useful data from > this. > > I really think it's time for a 'band plan / code of conduct' for 500 > kHz. I for one would adhere to anything generally agreed to. How about > an on-line questionaire to operators / listeners ? > > 73 Chris G3XIZ I would support the current trend for beacons/QRSS to be towards the top end of the band. There are quite a few people crystal controlled on 502.0 and with an (apparent) increase in activity at the moment it seems sensible to keep the area above and below there available for CW QSOs. I found this morning listening to G4ADR calling CQ on 502.0 immediately followed by a QRZ from Adrian G4GDR and was a bit hesitant which of them to call when there was no response. Almost a pileup! We really need at least 1.5kHz to accomodate the current number of active CW ops and to allow for possible increased activity in the future. I am not sure an on line poll would work, there is always a problem getting people to vote... (and you know my views on QRSS). 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com