X-GM-THRID: 1242246556838609221 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.11 with SMTP id u11cs330139hue; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.221.6 with SMTP id t6mr574050ugg.1184701804423; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1si33751nfh.2007.07.17.12.50.00; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IAsv8-0005nI-44 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:41:18 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IAsv7-0005n9-Ln for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:41:17 +0100 Received: from smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.69]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IAsv4-0004K3-4C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:41:17 +0100 Received: (qmail 90700 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2007 19:41:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Dave) (dsergeant@btinternet.com@81.157.212.26 with login) by smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2007 19:41:03 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: d9ClW1AVM1n4OA_ypPC_6vRZUBU2aBNKKAcpFuiUVjSFqdR3_TST5Q5MwiQUtmdWzLt5GolmK8wLNzA2xncOWrot8mE.begVh6s85H44ji9eLm3C From: "Dave Sergeant" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:41:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <469D2962.25644.309582E@dave.davesergeant.com> In-reply-to: <006701c7c8a3$794be570$2201a8c0@VicsLaptop> References: , <006701c7c8a3$794be570$2201a8c0@VicsLaptop> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: LF 500khz Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1229 On 17 Jul 2007 at 19:51, Vic@VicsFloridaVilla wrote: > > I would ceratinly appreciate a scan of your tx design . That would > give me a good start. My design skills are rather limited - my only rf > qualification is the RAE which I tookin 1978 but I love tinkering and > homebrew. Having built a K2 and recently a KX1 I have gained a lot of > confidence to have a crack at a 500khz rig. So far the transverter > looks very promising. If you have not found it already, you might also be interested in my transmitter - see http://www.davesergeant.com/mf/ > Having followed the postings on the reflector I agree a pre selector > on rx looks essential and I think a resonant antenna. But some > stations seem to get quite good results with fairly modest antennas so > there is hope ! I along with a few others use the Datong UC/1 upconverter (feeding my K2) and get excellent results. Good sensitivity and no problems whatsoever from MW crossmod. The UC/1 has a fairly sharp preselector at its front end so guess that helps. > My progress on 500 will be slow due to other comittments but I am > determined to put out a signal on that band ! > I guess the 1 year experiment will be over before some of us really get going on the band. I seem to be going one step forward and one step backwards at the moment. This afternoon I took the opportunity between the showers to establish the impedance of my vertical at its base - Gould sig generator on a long extension lead in the garden. Using G3LDO's 3-meter impedance tester I carefully adjusted the tuning inductor and matching ferrite transformer to get a nice 50ohm resistive impedance at the antenna base. Went back in to the shack and found a diabolical swr there..... Maybe I have some very strange coax if 50 ohms at one end produces silly impedance at the other.... 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com