Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x55CSY8J031878 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 14:28:36 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hYUxN-0007uw-R4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 13:23:53 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hYUxN-0007un-2p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 13:23:53 +0100 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hYUxK-0001zD-9O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 13:23:51 +0100 Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id d17so2052874wmb.3 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 05:23:50 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KQW8qZZ/Ln6q54+TgFMRvZb0BIzSsVChmdLaHZg4phM=; b=FU8/h9PVAINeUVQLi+3UriN/qjkmpKti49PJc4cJF5FHwBhraww6/m79hmj39Al0rm 6ax+U1doSX6FUJV5Gao8S+kpeshKXEDc/JMCF3K1MCP8BpmtYMxV7U614lmABt5s/1Lz cyzkMERMvle7FPbisU4r8fGtpWMHg/kVtYfX0QxOPTN+wp0yn4wFi6Do/XQhWVXfzY/Y tz9/0+yUILioVOjyR/C4nwhcEV+IuKqInMUHE+7VTTo5sjSzfYgReF1noczriYUcm3GD NpTbWXKuRNtNdUfIxPOmg0B8kMDq9/nVolg9rx37lm8aFJ1szXpq0fu/4vAI4Tv5C0aL H+yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KQW8qZZ/Ln6q54+TgFMRvZb0BIzSsVChmdLaHZg4phM=; b=txmS9p9dJq8wihDIqSthLkUR3UtRsKCHutnad1wwtL5/5AR1lrFPqM8BD1JtWjl1Bl Z9xq7LoQMLAFUiBnuNWmIHDt9SI57kz4RpkqDoiNtns+q6kwfDPOPEfedRPoBsSO1T0z RftY/eZV63V0yHLelBsJ8oXM8ZprcXIj8LvFR1V68LIV1nPPDb8h7puyYD6CuwXShGbS xrs2QBOp9xdoo/tc7Ywhvmr5/q0ttpATinCTBQMbYbzKHRflllF7CNKKp25PAng1ldcX WMKqiuZV+9kSp9i7eZ7uj3Ol4dFk77KF2KrQWlZ6SVmwBdNgki6pWdeWRyjSBpMme/fn MFDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUqVyO7BPTTJX9cl3dspnXWbjcd3p1kM6xZH5dtKDjmxS+rGg5g 8GeuzJqE4b38yu1HGpoaf9K+kXp5O3M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfZmQsaCR6Hfx+rPg1vU+wxFRWO4vjEIN/+4F4sgU3R4GX3MQPYNVKizN0OatfPfhajjxVDA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc0a:: with SMTP id f10mr10949790wmh.81.1559737429105; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 05:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k125sm38820678wmb.34.2019.06.05.05.23.47 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jun 2019 05:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 13:23:47 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <46938948.20190605132347@gmail.com> To: DK7FC In-Reply-To: <5CF57EF2.5020908@posteo.de> References: <12210097510.20190602151107@gmail.com> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7E18@servigilant.vigilant.local> <708133720.20190603165640@gmail.com> <5CF57EF2.5020908@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello all, We put the output of the si5351A and the level converter through an attenuator into my SA and things look horrible 9to me, but I am A: Not very good with the SA and B: frightened of blowing the front [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:32a listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-Scan-Signature: f1284eec928b6c66f973fc41cf683e42 Subject: Re: LF: Re: HEF 4013 flip flop anomaly Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello all, We put the output of the si5351A and the level converter through an attenuator into my SA and things look horrible 9to me, but I am A: Not very good with the SA and B: frightened of blowing the front end! We then used the W1VD big LPF bank between the output and the SA and things look much better (to me...). Could the harmonics be the cause of the issues??? http://www.chriswilson.tv/mf.zip First photo is direct from si5351A and level conveter, second is with the LPF in line. Thanks. I also checked on LF and there are lots of harmonics there too, but on LF the amp gives no trouble at all. Monday, June 3, 2019, 9:11:30 PM, you wrote: > If that voltage divider is against +12V, is that voltage level actually > stable during switching? Maybe it is worth to spend a RC lowpass filter > there, say 1 k and 100 nF and then adjust the DC working point. > 73, Stefan > Am 03.06.2019 17:56, schrieb Chris Wilson: >> >> Hello Luis, >> >> I am at work but will draft a more detailed post later. The new >> CD74HCT74E flip flop board shows similar horrible traces, so I think >> you may well be on to something here! Thank you. My doubt though is >> using an HP signal generator to inject a X2 frequency also shows the >> same dire waveforms, I would have *THOUGHT* its signal would be pretty >> clean? My USB scope has an FFT function and the gates and drains don't >> look good on it, using the U3S (no output stage sig straight from >> CLK0 pin of the Si5351A) but it's a bit of a toy in that mode. I could use an >> SA to look at the input and fiddle with a LFP on it I suppose. Thanks >> again. >> >> Sunday, June 2, 2019, 9:38:07 PM, you wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Chris >>> >> >>> One of the modifications I have done to the LF PA is related to the input at HEF4013 >>> >> >>> I was using the typical 220nF in series and a 12K and 10K resistors to +12V and GND >>> The exciter is also an U3, but the old one with DDS. Anyway, the >>> problem was that the input was too >>> sensible (too high impedance) and any small signal drived the HEF4013. The drain waveforms were >>> also not nice at all, and not squared. I even found that just >>> touching the input of the PA with my >>> finger drived it out at make the mosfets to work in a very unstable and ugly way >>> >> >>> So modified the input components to work as low pass filter and provide lower impedance >>> The 220nF was changed to 47pF and the 10K to GND replaced with a 5K adjustable trimmer >>> The 12K to 12V is still in use. You will have to use different values for MF to get it working >>> a 950KHz >>> >> >>> I adjusted the trimmer to work with a 270KHz input signal at 8V5 >>> p-p. Higer frequency signals do not drive >>> the HEF4013 at all. Now this is a completely different PA. Squared >>> drain waveforms and absolutely stable >>> >> >>> Seems that garbage in = garbage out rule do also apply here ;-) >>> >> >>> Have a try and let us know. It is an easy test >>> >> >>> 73 de Luis >>> EA5DOM >>> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________________ >>> De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de Chris Wilson [dead.fets@gmail.com] >>> Enviado: domingo, 2 de junio de 2019 16:11 >>> Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Asunto: LF: HEF 4013 flip flop anomaly >>> >> >>> Hi, I thought a separate thread best for this question >>> >> >>> U3S exciter for MF, taking the X2 frequency output @ circa 950 kHz >>> from the Si5351A CLK0 output pin to a level converter using a >>> SN74AHCT125N buffer between the si5351a and the HEF4013 flip flop,and >>> we are seeing something we do not understand, maybe someone can >>> explain? >>> >> >>> We have an adjustable voltage regulator off the main 12V supply for the >>> HEF4013, next to it on my little driver board, and by chance, we found >>> that as we lower the voltage to the HEF4013 the drain waveforms clean >>> up, and just before the 4013 shuts down they are relatively good. I'll >>> link to scope shots. >>> >> >>> We have the driver board grounded right by the driver IC ground points >>> to as near the FET source pins as the layout will allow (10 mm or so, >>> copper sheet strap) Before we go further we would like to know why >>> reducing the voltage to the 4013 improves things! We also see the gate >>> waveforms go negative when the FET's have power to them, without >>> voltage applied they are perfectly square. You can see this effect in >>> the screenshots. Gates are lower traces, drains upper. Thanks. >>> >> >>> We are building a board using a CD74HCT74E flip flop in the meantime, >>> we suspect a 4000 series is not the best choice... >>> >> >>> http://www.chriswilson.tv/4-point-8v-on-4013-25v-on-drains.png >>> >> >> >>> http://www.chriswilson.tv/6v-on-4013-25v-on-drains.png >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com