X-GM-THRID: 1240882021327490770 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.10 with SMTP id u10cs351082hue; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr3085295huf.1183398876918; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1si7713848nfh.2007.07.02.10.54.27; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1I5Q3g-0004Oc-Vn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:51:32 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1I5Q3g-0004OT-Iz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:51:32 +0100 Received: from smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.63]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I5Q3f-0008Tq-Ga for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:51:32 +0100 Received: (qmail 10460 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2007 17:51:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Dave) (dsergeant@btinternet.com@81.157.212.26 with login) by smtp803.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 2007 17:51:22 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: VRsCWVQVM1mU9W5XqoCv.jCU0npj8QiaK28dIPN2lmB6gUfnqHagsqAXNSnjT9LWMpXIM5LcuZNaC84EuElg3SBS5pp3opR52XTDiUO.rsoal5l3 From: "Dave Sergeant" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:51:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <46894929.28281.2A8E776@dave.davesergeant.com> In-reply-to: <003801c7bccd$31a5de60$876a6a58@wgt01> References: <003801c7bccd$31a5de60$876a6a58@wgt01> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 500 - Signal on 504 KHz Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1219 The second harmonic of RTE has always been present on 504kHz here, though normally only copyable by ear after dark. I am surprised you didn't know this, it has been occasionally mentioned on here and is no secret. Convenient frequency calibration mark! The RTE transmitter is due to change to DRM sometime soon. Maybe they are doing some changes in preparation for this. I am not sure what the implications for us are when they do the DRM change, presumably then we won't have the carrier but instead have harmonics of the DRM noise which would spread right over our allocation. 73 Dave G3YMC On 2 Jul 2007 at 18:19, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Hi All, > > During my monitoring of 500 KHz I have almost always seen a line on > SpecLab at 504.0 KHz. Whilst attempting to improve a shielded loop for > 500 KHz I have been receiving the signal on 504.0 KHz stronger & > stronger with accompanying hetrodyne. After todays changes to my loop > the signal has become so strong that I now hear garbled audio & > SpecLab is showing audio sidebands (see capture attached). I notice > that there is a line at the same frequency on the Bimingham Grabber > some of the time. I first thought it was some product of mixing strong > signals in the MF range. I decided to try to work it out & realised > that in fact it is the second harmonic of RTE Radio 1 on 252 KHz. I > have studied the uninteligable audio pattern & it does relate to that > signal. > > I must admit that I don't know if it due to improvements or some other > quirk of my loop or just the fact that the filtering at RTE Radio 1 is > poor. Although this signal has got stronger with changes to my loop > there doesn't appear to be the same improvement with normal 500 KHz > signals. > > Perhaps someone can shed some light on this for me. > > 73 > > Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp > > http://www.davesergeant.com