X-GM-THRID: 1240120713340264904 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.10 with SMTP id u10cs577133hue; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.170.2 with SMTP id s2mr10156765bue.1182678003141; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d23si3737107nfh.2007.06.24.02.39.56; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1I2OVw-0008H2-WC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:36:12 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1I2OVw-0008Gt-3k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:36:12 +0100 Received: from smarthost4.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.14]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I2OVv-0008JX-1D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:36:12 +0100 Received: from bb-87-82-16-246.ukonline.co.uk ([87.82.16.246] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by smarthost4.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1I2OVr-000BHA-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:36:07 +0100 Message-ID: <467E3B0D.40309@ukonline.co.uk> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:36:13 +0100 From: Peter Dodd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001101c7b632$d5a7ea40$5cd9e150@o> In-Reply-To: <001101c7b632$d5a7ea40$5cd9e150@o> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: 500; RFI source captured... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1262 Interesting! I have been plagued by a similar QRM for over three years, which seems to be centred on the 14MHz band. It is distributed over an area of a couple of miles mainly by the telephone lines. I have had a description of this QRM on my website for some time now but no one has been able to identify it as yet. It has even been described in the the EMC column in RadCom and has still not been identified. I would appreciate any help on this matter. All details can be found on my website (including wav files) - click on QRM REPORT on the index page to be found at http://web.ukonline.co.uk/g3ldo or from Google enter g3ldo, click G3LDO Index. In the meantime I will check all wall warts Regards Peter G3LDO Gw3UEP wrote: > Failed Wart: Post Mortem... > Its dc-o/p is modulated with 100pps pulses. These contain an RF-burst > envelope, chirping from MF to HF. > System had been working fine for 3yrs - then owner lost sync & B/B > connection; village became qrm hot-spot via BT-lines. > The routers appeared to be powered-up as normal - hours had been spent > arguing with BT who were oblivious to the problem. > Confusingly, the routers had been tested elsewhere & were ok. It > finally emerged that a spare/second wart had been used for these tests. > Rog. >