Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
From: "Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:04:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <46495B84.16677.2783A9@dave.davesergeant.com>
In-reply-to: <4648D997.4050707@usa.net>
References: <004e01c79610$0592d320$fe79a8c0@PCVONWALTER>, <4648D997.4050707@usa.net>
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: LF: Rugby - Anthorn
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

On 14 May 2007 at 23:50, Alberto di Bene wrote:

> The recent move of the 60 kHz time/frequency reference station from
> Rugby to Anthorn has considerably contributed to the diminution of RF
> pollution, at least here where I live... :-) Rugby was S9 on average,
> using the Roelof active whip, while Anthorn rarely exceeds S3...
> 
> I thought I had to report this change of signal strength, even if it
> probably is of no interest for the majority of you... :-)
> 
> 73  Alberto  I2PHD
> 
> 
> 

Althorn is definitely a lot down in strength here in IO91PJ compared 
with Rugby, and I know they had predicted this would be the case as 
it is significantly further away. But if it is that far down in Italy 
then maybe their new antennas are not getting out as well as the old 
ones. Occasionally my MSF clock loses the signal.

73 Dave G3YMC

http://www.davesergeant.com