Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9ODLcW3018931 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:21:39 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e6z4E-00074A-HR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:16:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e6z4D-000741-CY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:16:25 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e6z49-0006nq-Hp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:16:24 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id y9so8412783wrb.2 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 06:16:21 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sydnQ9Y2CdT38gQ3Rj83lB257kJKfRMisFtPp7+7xnk=; b=l3rf1NfaGW5bwR4Ev7oKCgabtknv7lf71zeoNHdfwGOcrt/RdNoTd7pIsz/bYNqhfG 97dfV7pZ7VLA48S/ck+N8sVBaiAxi8fPVfWZUl6a6KnT32bOLEUBmaeoT2qBh3/U8MSb g9NjQbBFo1OoglTQ3Jh0eiNRTrNxduNR2Qh83a/2rIL6LK14PUEshjAXkr72PKi+SDjH wekUQKo5vkOnKYKqxOvKdVXetLbmKaY7m64wSoHogE4yraf56qLhfO2vA4TqqjqQMEth QpBd2j0g0EwcNiRiDHwI/XYl7ImOFMtHxxnryM+d0AMq3gt/JhZ1a+XM3pPuGlIKy6Hj dCvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sydnQ9Y2CdT38gQ3Rj83lB257kJKfRMisFtPp7+7xnk=; b=JrnUtkTbPiqnLb2ugyKBusyt95tN3X/3RPiUkROHNr0qriU4EmZacIKxguWe1/meuP A0ONM3eDBSmAkHGF5ZUpPjDYE18BM5dXBovS2hhHEiWMoo2u3zBJo30Acyjlm7H7fXem kYTI0FpYrWs6cMn+P8V82reKYqCjv7cLedKtDT3HjJ6PCO7nImEMXMiEYGK3niyn+2Vm Ltaqe4wPjc4Qc6Gr6dzHpVvudwz8zhUjxhWHGLdhL95ISRa7gaQ8enNN4gwIPr4OJw2r loUy9ogqKJJmmsMm9QT+PaZWQGU3PhDSHELiF0pP++nuzAzYHIaskzL4nLT8lxYEXMSc bFNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVs3FjOkzyby6BUUaZpKs/NSi3tmI6ko7Kixq4OVCNLVNJqyRxb GoRmSAmAwILe/DIZhfqOmo322w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TIMCBRQsjY793gzHFOhAdBWzppjZaiU1y+nqKpgxYVLFGgzVQjfJ8qbHUW33fG+cHd2z0OGg== X-Received: by 10.223.146.37 with SMTP id 34mr13905338wrj.79.1508850979826; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 06:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t131sm381645wmd.12.2017.10.24.06.16.18 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 06:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:16:17 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <46184300.20171024141617@gmail.com> To: dhchurch In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Hugh, I am assuming the regular transmission you refer to is mine Hugh? In case you or anyone else here thinks I have ignored your multi frequency reports, I have not. I have, in recent weeks, used a G0MRF amp, a G3YXM and my W1VD amp, all of which have their own dedicated LPF assemblies. I have used U3S exciter, and used my Kenwood TS-590 as well. I have used each of them on a SMPS, two high end commercial linear supplies, and on a bank of car batteries, and have tried two different matching transformer arrangements and two different loading coils. You still see multiple TX frequencies from me, only their level changes, which is expected as the amps have different power capabilities. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 17343f7e400f1005b5081acbd4115359 Subject: Re: LF: MF/160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id v9ODLcW3018931 Hello Hugh, I am assuming the regular transmission you refer to is mine Hugh? In case you or anyone else here thinks I have ignored your multi frequency reports, I have not. I have, in recent weeks, used a G0MRF amp, a G3YXM and my W1VD amp, all of which have their own dedicated LPF assemblies. I have used U3S exciter, and used my Kenwood TS-590 as well. I have used each of them on a SMPS, two high end commercial linear supplies, and on a bank of car batteries, and have tried two different matching transformer arrangements and two different loading coils. You still see multiple TX frequencies from me, only their level changes, which is expected as the amps have different power capabilities. I also have SA screen shots from an in calibration HP8568B analyser which shows sidebands to be well down and no real spurious emissions. So, I feel have gone the extra mile in time and cost to address this and short of moving I am at a loss to as to what more I can do and why you see this, when other very close stations apparently do not, and nothing untoward shows on the G3YXM grabber which isn't that far away from me. Regards, Chris Wilson Monday, October 23, 2017, 8:07:18 PM, you wrote: > > > Hello Andy > > The idea of using any SMPS in, or near, the shack is somewhat > abhorrent. It is possible to introduce a series circuit in a linear > PSU which is not exactly a regulator but has a hum cancellation > circuit, something that used to appear in an ancient National > Semiconductor publication. I'd love to try it but just haven't left > any room in my PSUs, they're stuffed full, including a cooling fan. > A couple of 100Hz side bands are at least predictable, my PA has, > but there is one regular transmission on LF which has all manner of > spurii making reception here somewhat variable. > > I think Dave, GW8GLO, has a system which promptly knocks off his > transmitter SMPS when going into Rx mode, maybe this is the way to go. > > 73, Hugh, M0DSZ > > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > From: Andy Talbot > Receiver: rsgb_lf_group > Time: 2017-10-23, 10:12:17 > Subject: Re: Re: LF: MF/160 > > > > > Its a difficult call - I have a similar problem with my 700 Watt > 137kHz Tx.   30dB hum sidebands corresponds to 3% ripple, which in > the main scheme of things is not that much.   It would need an > enormous reservoir capacitor to make a serious reduction.   > > Either that or design the Tx to run from 50V and use a SMPSU instead of raw rectified AC > > > Andy  G4JNT > > On 23 October 2017 at 10:03, dhchurch wrote: > > > > Mal, I think a little attention should be paid to, perhaps, your > power supply. The 100Hz sidebands, as I recall from earlier > this week, should be much lower in level. Seen on Spectrum > Lab at one stage, they were less than -30dB in comparative level.  >   > 73, Hugh, M0DSZ -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com