Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <459F6843.10505@freenet.de>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:13:39 +0100
From: Wolf DL4YHF <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <E1H2rvT-0004dE-TA@www9.emo.freenet-rz.de> <20070106011110.2iu4h2bvhswggk4c@webmail.versatel.de>
In-Reply-To: <20070106011110.2iu4h2bvhswggk4c@webmail.versatel.de>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: more castle
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Uwe,

Thanks for the observation ...


> seems there grows a problem: I cant see any gap btwn the letters
> C and Q, D and K, K and 4, 4 and U.  but btwn Q and D es U and K
> the gaps are O.K. so you will find out how to implement the gaps
> btwn the other letters as well.
>
Ok, no problem to add a short gap between *all* letters, and a larger 
gap between *words*.
But the result would be very similar to DFCW; while CASTLE doesn't need 
these spaces in most occasions (where you recognize the begin of a new 
letter because the first "dash" or "dot" is closest to the reference). 
For example, having no gap between "C" and "Q" (etc) is no problem - it 
just saves precious time in the TA business ;-). Anyway for the sake of 
readability I will add the short gap between *any* combination of 
letters now to keep things simple.

Have a nice weekend everyone,

73, Wolf DL4YHF