Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <459D3711.4020101@freenet.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:19:13 +0100
From: Wolf DL4YHF <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <002601c7301c$9a742930$15b2a8c0@dk5na2f78e2d5d> <000f01c73020$de3991b0$bd01a8c0@acer9412>
In-Reply-To: <000f01c73020$de3991b0$bd01a8c0@acer9412>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: dk4u
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hello Ko, Michael and Jeff,

Congrats Jeff, that's a nice explanation ! ;-)

In fact, it's a variant of multi-frequency CW called "CASTLE mode" by 
ZL1BPU. I have now implemented this mode in spectrum lab for testing 
purposes (SpecLab V2.7 build 13). How to decode CASTLE visually is 
explained here:

http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/MICRO/EXCITER/castle.htm

The transmission (from DK4U) was just a short on-air test. Though CASTLE 
is a bit faster than DFCW, imho it's not the best suited mode for 
inner-EU slow morse contacts due to the increased bandwidth usage.


Cheers,
 Wolf DL4YHF (back from DK4U already).

F6CWN schrieb:
> 04./01/2007   1652z
>
>
> Perhaps a DFCW system can be which did not recover from holidays of 
> the New Year!     :0)
>
> HNY to all!
>
> 73: Jeff F6CWN
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael DK5NA" 
> <m.peters@peters-placke.de>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:22 PM
> Subject: LF: dk4u
>
>
>> hi to all,
>>
>> ups, was that? 
>
>
>
>
>