Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.213]) by air-de05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE051-5eb24caa4de4306; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:57:56 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 65952380000A0; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:57:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P2t1G-0002Co-BU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:56:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P2t1F-0002Cf-Qy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:56:25 +0100 Received: from n2-vm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.23.155]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P2t1D-0001ZC-T4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:56:25 +0100 Received: from [98.137.27.132] by n2.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2010 21:56:15 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.111] by t4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2010 21:56:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp115.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2010 21:56:15 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 613601.45953.bm@omp115.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 23992 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Oct 2010 21:56:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1286229375; bh=Qef29dCJnNry0wn+fe8I5VNCKcGrXZpbbDLHhCAN6Js=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ch/9K4+qeEuv0hKgyZMCPG2ByYlWn10yxrNH7SyaDmAJdhiC3XXKKNDenhw6xeyhQTehHu8lPLIYlg6MU5pRzI9p0FMbFz1NzBH9jyaC3n/q0W6TMOhZxdtjZI+Y+/DlMRE0tmWqjnrFrBe2pzD+9OYkWIRUpGVUDuQMVliy2ic= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rvQDOwShK94Lv8fjOZzkNU+uEvpntKZqG91IpzWjLTVi4ttvvgcBGa7s9oSG8qEYTtl5Nwur/PQi+CmHYGr7KX/p3YMkZgmnxnPWTiCeyCneo9uksBFCZyafz29jkx0xqPOPbucAYUpv40BsLyonNZtI1TrOtSZ2s5qMSrsrDNE=; Message-ID: <455470.92877.qm@web111911.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: hw0pAH8VM1mGPG9nvmSKvIk1YE.5J0TtXU8VuwfRNHOnpg0 wsa8A5HFcLyGfwAb71JDfiPLLbfdhaVhRJZU3RHf_EX3Ks1OeCexj0VKrtFy yo0c.WxFSF8TiBFN9e0qWWE.Sl6p.7Rp863Pb080b9X2BsdhxGrBU9gOdzbX EIOue17AsvVBSgZS.Zs9GPcq5j7SIt1wzb.BfA0haQap8_qCHRelOQ2eSPqS UUP7d6b94HLhrA94w2hCVHsbdO3s31Qb_yzTKsncF5wIGcQ2lRkZaYO9nxcX OJw-- Received: from [87.1.203.100] by web111911.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:56:15 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/497 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <4CA9BDE0.4000601@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <646839.20132.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CAA4521.6070301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4CAA4521.6070301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: VLF at different locations and QRN as a function of daytime Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-805786699-1286229375=:92877" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m206.1 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d54caa4de249df X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-805786699-1286229375=:92877 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan, VLF, would a wide-band capture over 24 hours from my QTH/receiver be of some in= terest=20 for you? If so, I think I could be able to send=A0the results to you by th= e end of=20 this week or so (hoping batteries last enough :-)).=A0Probably it could ma= ke sense=20 to share the same .usr file for SpecLab so that to ensure a bit of consist= ency=20 when comparing figures from different locations. My sound card support 96KHz sampling at 24 bits/sample, but I found that= card's=20 noise looks much better when sampling at 48KHz. Best regards Daniele ________________________________ From: Stefan Sch=E4fer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 11:20:33 PM Subject: Re: VLF: VLF at different locations and QRN as a function of dayt= ime Hi Daniele, No problem about the callsign ;-) On VLF you don't even need one for=20 transmitting, hi. Oh, you are in JN53EM, i haven't known that. The distance is 707 km! This= is the=20 3rd best distance at all! Unbelivable, for a antenna in that location, ver= y=20 fine!!! I hope cou can improve your RX situation if this is your goal. And i hope i can transmit more meaningful messages the next time ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 04.10.2010 14:57, schrieb Daniele Tincani:=20 Hello Stefan, VLF, > >frankly speaking, it is still unbelievable to me that I was able to=A0cat= ch a=20 >faint trace of your signal and see it appearing on my PC. This is because= of the=20 >intense hum at my location and the unsophisticated reception system that= I use.=20 >Anyway, I'm=A0glad to=A0read your opinion that the screenshot I captured= was really=20 >showing your tx :-) >I'm also interested in supporting your idea of collecting information abo= ut=20 >local QRN at different locations. I'm aways looking for simple-to-build= =20 >solutions for improving my setup. May be some helpful information could= emerge=20 >from this data analysis you are proposing. >For the time being, these are the information you have requested: the loc= ator is=20 >JN53EM. As for the callsign, I'm sorry, I haven't one. I'm only "register= ed" as=20 >a SWL and my identifier is I0169LI (http://www.qrz.com/db/I0169LI/). > >Cheers >Daniele > > =20 --0-805786699-1286229375=:92877 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Stefan, VLF,
 
would a wide-band capture over 24 hours from my QTH/receiver be of so= me interest for you? If so, I think I could be able to send the resul= ts to you by the end of this week or so (hoping batteries last enough :-))= . Probably it could make sense to share the same .usr file for SpecLa= b so that to ensure a bit of consistency when comparing figures from diffe= rent locations.
My sound card support 96KHz sampling at 24 bits/sample, but I found= that card's noise looks much better when sampling at 48KHz.
 
Best regards
Daniele
=

From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <= ;schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Mon, October 4, 2010 11:20:33 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: VLF at different= locations and QRN as a function of daytime

Hi Daniele,
<= BR>No problem about the callsign ;-) On VLF you don't even need one for tr= ansmitting, hi.

Oh, you are in JN53EM, i haven't known that. The di= stance is 707 km! This is the 3rd best distance at all! Unbelivable, for= a antenna in that location, very fine!!!

I hope cou can improve yo= ur RX situation if this is your goal.

And i hope i can transmit mor= e meaningful messages the next time ;-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am= 04.10.2010 14:57, schrieb Daniele Tincani:=20
Hello Stefan, VLF,
 
frankly speaking, it is still unbelievable to me that I was able to&n= bsp;catch a faint trace of your signal and see it appearing on my PC. This= is because of the intense hum at my location and the unsophisticated rece= ption system that I use. Anyway, I'm glad to read your opinion= that the screenshot I captured was really showing your tx :-)
I'm also= interested in supporting your idea of collecting information about local= QRN at different locations. I'm aways looking for simple-to-build solutio= ns for improving my setup. May be some helpful information could emerge fr= om this data analysis you are proposing.
For the time being, these are the information you have requested: the= locator is JN53EM. As for the callsign, I'm sorry, I haven't one. I'm onl= y "registered" as a SWL and my identifier is I0169LI (http://www.qrz.com/d= b/I0169LI/).
 
Cheers
Daniele



--0-805786699-1286229375=:92877--