Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:40:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <44E88258.14756.598E2B@localhost>
In-reply-to: <001c01c6c455$110d8200$45be3b3e@fujitsu>
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS/DFCW timing
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

On 20 Aug 2006 at 14:31, Dick wrote:

> I wonder if there is anything about fixed TX/RX periods when using
> QRSS/DFCW. I mean like it is used to be on moonbounce and
> meteorscatter for instance.
> 
> Like transmit 5 minutes, RX 5 minutes, all synchronized of course by
> starting at exact the whole hour or so.
> 
> Transmitting QRSS is no longer a question for me, but I do not have
> any experience in the 'real' QSO's. There is a need to find a way to
> make QSO's as efficient as possible, and also as quick as possible
> during the upcoming DX-pedition, because I will be limited in
> operation time, and want to work as many as possible, hi. DFCW could
> be a nice solution to save time.
> 
> 73
> 
> Dick