X-GM-THRID: 1210064181903762437 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 6c3d19c04cc4ac5c686cdeed56503526f7595ba0 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.250.6 with SMTP id x6cs323814qbh; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.41.18 with SMTP id t18mr62713nfj; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id a23si2962435nfc.2006.07.27.15.35.12; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1G6EPB-0005MA-LU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:32:33 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1G6EPB-0005M1-8e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:32:33 +0100 Received: from smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.12]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1G6EP6-0004Kr-MG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:32:32 +0100 Received: from bb-87-82-6-66.ukonline.co.uk ([87.82.6.66] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1G6EP5-000MYX-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:32:27 +0100 Message-ID: <44C94628.9030404@ukonline.co.uk> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:03:04 +0100 From: Peter Dodd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c6b17e$4823a8d0$e6a4c593@RD40002> In-Reply-To: <000001c6b17e$4823a8d0$e6a4c593@RD40002> X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.303 Subject: Re: LF: Tapped loading coil design spreadsheet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4866 james moritz wrote: > I have been doing some investigation into the design of tapped loading > coils for LF antennas � specifically, where to put the tap for the TX > connection to achieve matching to 50 ohms. As far as I can see, there > is no simple formula that gives a realistic result, and generally the > tapping point is selected by trial and error. But it would be nice to > know at least approximately where the taps should be, to take the > guesswork out of making a coil. > Experimental work in 1996 to 1998 on the 73kHz band was concerned mainly with how to transfer RF power from the amplifier to the antenna. Most of the amplifiers used at the time were high power audio amplifiers with an output impedance of 4ohms so the 50ohms system was a bit irrelevant. The tapping point (loading) was affected by the resonance adjustment (tuning). In fact I used a 8 turn multi-tapped coupling link on a 7mH coil, normally tapped at 4 turns (73kHz). The method of tuning was to note the PA FET current while tuning through resonance, while at the same time noting the antenna RF current. The objective was to obtain the greatest RF current while at the same time ensuring the PA FET power dissipation was not exceeded. Regards Peter, G3LDO