X-GM-THRID: 1209276885889126028
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
X-Gmail-Received: 55bdc791172278fdb9f3a07da029ff7da40936cb
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.243.13 with SMTP id q13cs190589qbh;
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.1.15 with SMTP id d15mr2014274nfi;
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h1si1143198nfe.2006.07.19.13.17.49;
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1G3IQt-0002eY-H6
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:14:11 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1G3IQt-0002eP-2a
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:14:11 +0100
Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.35])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <nl9222@xs4all.nl>)
id 1G3IQq-0001AM-9k
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:14:11 +0100
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (a82-92-108-254.adsl.xs4all.nl [82.92.108.254])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6JKDV2M034607
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:13:37 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from nl9222@xs4all.nl)
Message-ID: <44BE9271.2050205@xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:13:37 +0000
From: Ko Versteeg <nl9222@xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFGEOLCNAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk> <44BD2725.5040901@freenet.de> <038101c6aa9c$06a2a3e0$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <44BD4ACF.60505@usa.net>
In-Reply-To: <44BD4ACF.60505@usa.net>
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0629-1, 07/19/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.557,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.516
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Two soundcards or one?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 5515
Hi Peter and Alberto
You can do that but only 65536 times.
Why is Windows XP so restricted ;-)
73 Ko, NL9222
----------------------------------
Alberto di Bene wrote:
> Windows XP is even more flexible than that. Given that it virtualize the
> sound card, you can open the *same* sound card for input to more than
> one program, each with its own different sampling rate, and the same for
> output. All the resampling needed is done under the hood by Windows
> itself, sometimes with not so stellar results in terms of accuracy, but
> it works.
>
> Don't try the same with Windows 98SE (RIP, M$oft has announced its death
> a few days ago), it won't work...
>
> 73 Alberto I2PHD
> ----------------------------------
>
> Peter Martinez wrote:
>
>>> From G3PLX:
>>
>>
>> I don't know about earlier versions of Windows, but it's certainly
>> possible in XP to open a soundcard for input in one program, and open
>> the SAME soundcard for output in another program. I do it all the time.
>>
>> So it should be possible to send DFCW in one program and receive
>> something else into another program, both at the same time, and
>> without needing two soundcards.
>>
>> 73
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
>