X-GM-THRID: 1203533621080903190 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 5da78de6ff70b9ae22efa4c062b1a76941b9431b Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.17 with SMTP id z17cs24916wrc; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 06:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.89.6 with SMTP id r6mr3365530ugl; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m1si6090540uge.2006.06.05.06.05.27; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FnEhT-00082U-Ir for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:00:55 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FnEhS-00082L-Bk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:00:54 +0100 Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.42]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FnEhP-00058J-HT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:00:54 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([141.156.216.47]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J0E00BYN1H2FDD2@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:00:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:00:36 -0400 From: Andre Kesteloot In-reply-to: <44832B6D.3000805@g3ysx.org.uk> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-id: <44842AF4.2090802@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: <003e01c678db$dc5cad70$0200a8c0@AUG2004> <44832B6D.3000805@g3ysx.org.uk> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-2.529,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.374,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.376,HTML_60_70=0.027,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY=0.045,MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.158 Subject: Re: LF: Rb standard Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5352 Stewart Bryant wrote:

Walter Blanchard wrote:

A number of TAIT T801 frequency standards have just appeared on the UK surplus market.

They're ex-cellphone bases and I understand have been ditched in favour of GPS-locked standards.

It's more likely that they are now getting their clock from the PSTN network.

Stewart G3YSX

but don't they rely on GPS for geographical location of mobile callers? In that case, would they use two separate time references ?
73
André N4ICK