Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1CCDA38000096; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:34:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U9LmZ-0005SC-L7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:33:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U9LmZ-0005S3-94 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:33:19 +0000 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U9LmU-0005mb-9A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:33:18 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.245]) by mwinf5d50 with ME id 3wYt1l00R5HQ0Cq03wYtqu; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:32:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4482AC135BC74274965612F498FC34FD@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <512777BA.7040400@psk31.plus.com> <5DF82F0D027741818F88CCBF68DA6EBB@AGB> <5127B149.8020809@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <5127B149.8020809@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:32:53 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hat munching time again : ) WSPR-15 proved to the better WSPR for far distances. From: "g3zjo" Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:56 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: 630m WSPR2 and WSPR15 Distance [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: 630m WSPR2 and WSPR15 Distance Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a512927cd19ce X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hat munching time again : ) WSPR-15 proved to the better WSPR for far distances. -------------------------------------------------- From: "g3zjo" Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:56 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: 630m WSPR2 and WSPR15 Distance > Hi G > > On 22/02/2013 15:18, Graham wrote: >> Correlating random events again Ed .... :) > Just the fact's ma'am, just give me the facts. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragnet_%28series%29 1900 and WHAT oh dear. > > As for wanting to know how nice soft cheese is, so we set up an > experiment using dog excreta, little point.:-) > > Ed >