X-GM-THRID: 1204825919009180825
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
X-Gmail-Received: accd837c9b49eec17455342f76a6a591513def78
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.54.72.5 with SMTP id u5cs10505wra;
Tue, 30 May 2006 14:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.42.20 with SMTP id p20mr53206nfp;
Tue, 30 May 2006 14:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id x24si2931729nfb.2006.05.30.14.18.36;
Tue, 30 May 2006 14:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1FlBa3-0000Uz-MH
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 22:16:47 +0100
Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1FlBa3-0000Uq-6K
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 22:16:47 +0100
Received: from smtp.wp.pl ([212.77.101.1])
by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
id 1FlBZy-00011O-00
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 22:16:47 +0100
Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 14278 invoked from network); 30 May 2006 23:04:35 +0200
Received: from br198.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO [192.168.0.103]) (sq5bpm@[80.53.201.198])
(envelope-sender <sq5bpm@wp.pl>)
by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; 30 May 2006 23:04:35 +0200
Message-ID: <447CB34F.2060700@wp.pl>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:04:15 +0200
From: Marek SQ5BPM <sq5bpm@wp.pl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <006701c6840a$c791d340$11c428c3@captbrian> <447C9379.11105.E56D34@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <447C9379.11105.E56D34@localhost>
X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A.
X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO(Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1) AS2=NO(0.520407) AS3=NO AS4=NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.216
Subject: Re: LF: TU in Morse
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 6983
Hi all,
I believe in RTTY contests it means both, consider a short exchange:
> TEST DE SP5ZCC SP5ZCC CQ
< SP5ZCC DE G3XDV G3XDV
> G3XDV TU 599 010 010
< SP5ZCC TU 599 012 012
> G3XDV TU DE SP5ZCC CQ
During long contest hours I've been trying to figure that out, but seems
that people use it interchangeably, because it is useful for making
short macros.
BTW this whole QSO takes less time than a dot in some QRSS modes :)
73! Marek SQ5BPM
Mike Dennison wrote:
> TU means "thank you" and is more efficient (particularly in QRSS)
> than TKS or TNX.
>
> Mike, G3XDV
> ==========
>
>
>> I have always assumed TU to be "To You", perhaps someone will
>> confirm!!!
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Gary - G4WGT
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of captbrian
>> Sent: 30 May 2006 18:02 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF:
>> Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: how to do? (2)
>>
>>
>> also 'tks' but that's not the point ; what is 'TU'?/
>> On same topic when an EA sends '55' to a DL , what does he mean.
>>
>> Bryan
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>