X-GM-THRID: 1202173441387390069
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
X-Gmail-Received: 66db71b62eaaee08a7b24bbc7dfae393ef5a5992
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.54.72.15 with SMTP id u15cs17085wra;
        Mon, 1 May 2006 13:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.255.20 with SMTP id c20mr1485859nfi;
        Mon, 01 May 2006 13:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p72si2029118nfc.2006.05.01.13.55.23;
        Mon, 01 May 2006 13:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FafOR-0001lG-7u
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 21:53:19 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FafOQ-0001l7-U3
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 21:53:18 +0100
Received: from smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.10])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1FahFV-0006jk-1I
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 23:52:28 +0100
Received: from bb-87-82-30-78.ukonline.co.uk ([87.82.30.78] helo=[192.168.0.2])
	by smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 1FafMx-000Dow-00
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 21:51:47 +0100
Message-ID: <44567AF2.7000506@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 22:17:38 +0100
From: Peter Dodd <g3ldo@ukonline.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4455EC86.2050807@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4455EC86.2050807@wp.pl>
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.114
Subject: Re: LF: EMF sensitivity?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 6035

 Hi Marek
Engineers and other workers at Rugby and Criggion worked in the presence 
of very high LF RF fields without (to my knowledge) adverse affects.
There have been other high power LF transmitters, such at the 3MW 
installation in the USA (the name escapes me). If these sorts of health 
problems you describe were an issue would have been possible to operate 
and maintain such an installation?

Peter, G3LDO