X-GM-THRID: 1201390145947228971 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: c509050cc0137138b1dee630932413a917c15b2a Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.70.6 with SMTP id s6cs5782wra; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.251.4 with SMTP id d4mr68497qbs; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e10si1214149qbe.2006.04.23.01.44.01; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 01:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FXaA0-0000ky-Nw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:41:40 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FXaA0-0000kp-95 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:41:40 +0100 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([194.97.50.155]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FXbxq-0003qQ-Ry for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:37:32 +0100 Received: from [194.97.55.147] (helo=mx4.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FXa9i-0004Ca-95 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:41:22 +0200 Received: from p54869c6e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.134.156.110] helo=[192.168.0.200]) by mx4.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.61-RC1 #1) id 1FXa9i-0007vH-13 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:41:22 +0200 Message-ID: <444B3DDB.9020105@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:42:03 +0000 From: Wolf DL4YHF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <444AA539.8020603@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.936 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: RE: 18.5 kHz in CT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5641 MIKE REID schrieb: > Wolf, > > How about a big antenna with a rectifier/regulator ran off the antenna > for some free shack power?? > > Mike > WE0H Hi Mike, Yes I was tempted by that thought. But the rectifier would cause harmonic currents in the antenna wire, badly affecting by reception on LF (whow, back on topic..). So I will continue illuminating and heating the shack the usual way ! Nice sunday everyone, Wolf DL4YHF . > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Wolf DL4YHF > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Saturday, April 22, 2006 4:50 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: RE: Re: RE: 18.5 kHz in CT > > Greetings all, > > Gary you are lucky to receive the signal with "only" S9+10. > I am only 8 wavelengths away from the transmitter, and the signal > completely swamps the 'natural radio' signals (whistlers etc) which I > try to receive occasionally. Looks like I must build a new active > antenna with sharp lowpass or notch filter before the amplifier, > because > this new bird is going to stay ! > > 73, Wolf DL4YHF >