Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <44105B21.6000308@freenet.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:43:13 +0000
From: Wolf DL4YHF <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <030820061539.18005.440EFA980004BD4A0000465522007613940B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> <01dd01c642d8$e6cbc180$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <002701c642db$d1ebcb40$045bfea9@d4f8d8> <000701c642de$46eabe40$045bfea9@d4f8d8> <007201c64350$8a764810$0400a8c0@AUG2004>
In-Reply-To: <007201c64350$8a764810$0400a8c0@AUG2004>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Real QRP tests continued
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Walter Blanchard schrieb:

> Andy,
>
> Let me know the freq and I'll see if plain old ornery Speclab will do 
> the business.
>
> Walter G3JKV.
>
>
>
>
Hi Walter,

Let me suggest to use the "sampling rate calibration" (continuously 
running) though it's a bit complicated to set up. Of course you will 
need a reference signal in the audio range (15.625 kHz, 19.0000 kHz, or 
maybe some GPS-harmonic) to tame the drifting sampling rate.
I got some ideas from Peter 'PLX recently how the sampling-rate 
calibration could be improved and simplified, but haven't found the time 
to implement it in SL yet. More on that (hopefully) soon, before 
activity goes down again ;-)

Cheers,
  Wolf DL4YHF .