Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:46:32 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F55x0-0004Z5-2D for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:46:32 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F55wz-0004U8-PX for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:46:29 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F55vz-0004WY-Pf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:45:27 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F55vz-0004WP-7e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:45:27 +0000 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([194.97.50.131]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F56eq-0006LA-Ou for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:31:51 +0000 Received: from [194.97.55.147] (helo=mx4.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1F55vv-0007KU-1z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:45:23 +0100 Received: from p54868c05.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.134.140.5] helo=[192.168.0.200]) by mx4.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.61 #21) id 1F55vu-00017P-L0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:45:23 +0100 Message-ID: <43E3A4BD.8000108@freenet.de> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:45:17 +0000 From: Wolf DL4YHF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003901c62682$55767b70$0a8cf8d4@standalone> <43DF9979.8030105@freenet.de> <001001c626a5$53662420$943b7ad5@w4o8m9> In-Reply-To: <001001c626a5$53662420$943b7ad5@w4o8m9> Subject: Re: LF: Re: Colour palette, SNR, BW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Jim and group, Jim wrote: >Funnily enough, I tried something very similar with Spectrum Lab a while >ago - the palette up_down.pal attached is more or less what Andy described. >But I found the effect to be rather counter-intuitive, with strong signals >"punching holes" in the waterfall display. I settled on having a progression >blue-red-yellow-light green-white, as in the attachment jim.pal, which I >have been happy with ever since. > > > Thanks Jim ... I have added your palette to the "palettes" subdirectory now. I have taken the liberty to rename the files to: jim_black_blue_red_green_white and jim_up_down . The difference in the "up_down" palette only becomes obvious if the "contrast" slider is set to a moderate level. Otherwise, you may not see the point where the white region enters the "sunset" area and slowly turns black again. The new version is available on my website now. But for LF applications, not much inside SpecLab has changed. Only for those using image-cancelling direct conversion receivers (with I/Q input to the soundcard), it may be simpler to use because there is an easier-to-use method to compensate phase- and amplitude errors in the I- and Q- branch. Best regards, Wolf DL4YHF .